Local newspaper Skånskan recently published a highly credulous account of amateur archaeologist Bob Lind's outlandish interpretations of an Early Iron Age cemetery in Ravlunda parish. I wrote them to complain, and staff writer Karsten Bringmark asked me for a statement. Which made it onto the paper's web site, and possibly into print as well?
Aardvarchaeology
Martin Rundkvist's blog. Archaeology, skepticism, Sweden. And books and music and stuff.
Profile
Dr Martin Rundkvist is a Swedish archaeologist, journal editor, public speaker, skeptic, atheist, lefty liberal, bookworm, and father of two. This is the world's #1 archaeology blog according to Technorati.
Recent Posts
- Slave to Love
- Bob Lind Challenges Me to a Duel
- Sailing the Ley Lines with Dr. Curry
- Skepdude Beefcake Calendar
- Film Review: Sizzle
- Paddy K Seeks the Bridge of Orchy
- Four Stone Hearth Call for Submissions
- Cesspit Incavation
- 33 Test Pits
- Test Pitting at Djurhamn
Recent Comments
- CCBC on Slave to Love
- Martin R on Slave to Love
- barbara huffert on Slave to Love
- Marcus on Slave to Love
- Patrick on Slave to Love
- DrugMonkey on Slave to Love
- Left_Wing_Fox on Bob Lind Challenges Me to a Duel
- Garvarn on Bob Lind Challenges Me to a Duel
- Pierce R. Butler on Bob Lind Challenges Me to a Duel
- Martin R on Film Review: Journey to 10,000 BC
Search this blog
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
Good Blog Carnivals
Four Stone Hearth
« Sacred Field of the Shining One | Main | New Mircheva Photograph Subverts Beauty »
Local Newspaper Publishes Criticism of Bob Lind
Category: Archaeology • Sweden
Posted on: May 20, 2008 5:40 PM, by Martin R
Find more posts in:
Humanities & Social Science


Comments
I see that Bob Lind has already left a reply to your comments on that page. From what I can figure out using Google Translate, he blows off your comments because you lack knowledge of archaeoastronomy -- very amusing. Good work for challenging the quacks!
Posted by: Ellery | May 20, 2008 8:18 PM
That reply is pretty illustrative. It's poorly spelled and structured, it's full of invective, and out of the blue Bob starts talking about phalluses.
Posted by: Martin R | May 21, 2008 1:38 AM
Good work Martin!
Posted by: Magnus Reuterdahl | May 21, 2008 4:36 AM
Well, as Bob so eloquently points out, you're not an archaeo-astronomer. Only other archaeo-astronomers may criticise archaeo-astronomical claims. Along the same lines, only homeopaths may criticise homeopathy, and the same goes for holocaust revisionists.
What on earth were you thinking, dabbling in fields outside your own area of expertise?
Posted by: Pär | May 21, 2008 3:57 PM
Basically I'm just envious of all his amazing discoveries.
Posted by: Martin R | May 21, 2008 4:01 PM
Easy to fix. In the middle of a post about metaldetecting attack mispelled phalluses. Or something like that.
Posted by: blf | May 22, 2008 2:10 PM
I can't seem to find Lind's comments, have they been removed?
Posted by: Katarina | June 26, 2008 9:55 AM