Today's the eighth birthday of that excellent open on-line encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Let's all celebrate by going there and contributing some information! Even if it's your first time -- it's easy.
Aardvarchaeology
Wikipedia Eight Years Old
Today's the eighth birthday of that excellent open on-line encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Profile
Dr. Martin Rundkvist is a Swedish archaeologist, journal editor, public speaker, skeptic, atheist, lefty liberal, bookworm, and father of two.
Search
Recent Posts
- Why Malt the Barley for Beer?
- Like an Elephant
- Laptop Day
- Early Medieval Magnates Talk in Lund
- Dan Simmons's Scientific Let-Down
- Information Longevity Talk in Gothenburg
- Upgrading Ubuntu Linux is Risky
- Odin from Lejre? No, it's Freya!
- Recent Archaeology Mags
- Intellectual Aristocrat
Recent Comments
- Martin R on Why Malt the Barley for Beer?
- Bayesian Bouffant, FCD on Why Malt the Barley for Beer?
- Martin R on Why Malt the Barley for Beer?
- Thinker on Why Malt the Barley for Beer?
- Low On Prozac on US Politics Have No Left Wing
- Ny Björn Gustafsson on Odin from Lejre? No, it's Freya!
- Martin R on Odin from Lejre? No, it's Freya!
- Cliff Eastabrook on Odin from Lejre? No, it's Freya!
- yogi-one on Dan Simmons's Scientific Let-Down
- Martin R on Why Malt the Barley for Beer?
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
Blogroll
-->Good Blog Carnivals
« Anthro Blog Carnival | Main | Finally On-Line Again »
Wikipedia Eight Years Old
Category: Tech
Posted on: January 15, 2009 4:52 PM, by Martin R
Find more posts in:
Education & Careers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More





Comments
Eight years! How time flies...
I've never contributed original content, but I've corrected quite a few spelling and grammatical errors. I love that site.
Posted by: Larry Ayers | January 15, 2009 5:26 PM
Ooooh! Can we do the same to Conservapedia? Pleeeeease?
Posted by: Barry | January 15, 2009 7:45 PM
I've only ever contributed one article to Wikipedia, because I realised that it's one of those things where once you start you might never stop. When someone contributed a very outdated article on my pet count though I felt I had to step in and set it straight, and by the time I'd finished there was about two lines of the original left. It's only your posting this that's made me go and look; I was afraid it might all have been reverted back to crap. But in fact about ten people have put in work making my citations fit style and so on and the basic thing remains there. Cool :-)
Posted by: Jonathan Jarrett | January 16, 2009 5:57 AM
I was also afraid of getting completely sucked into it, but I found out that it's fun and doesn't actually take your entire life from you. (-;
You have a pet Count? Count Who?
Posted by: Martin R | January 16, 2009 6:02 AM
I've grown rather exasperated with the English Wikipedia, I have to say, though I still use the German version on occasion (with a little help from Babel fish). I looked up some info on geology once, found some very outlandish statements that couldn't possibly be right, so I wrote to a fellow at a local university, listed in one of the footnotes to check up on it. He wrote back with a joke at my expense basically telling me not to believe anything I read in Wikipedia. Another time, I looked up something on "Las Posadas," a Latino Christmas celebration I knew a little about and found next to nothing in English, so I entered my own notes from 30 years ago plus a translation of the Spanish song. A week later, someone hadn't just edited it but deleted the entire thing, substituting a much shorter Spanish-only text -- in the ENGLISH Wikipedia site. Evidently it's a sin not to speak Spanish in English Wikipedia land. I put in some data on Black English, also (being a linguist, I added full footnotes). This, too, was completely deleted and replaced by unfootnoted text. SIGH. As my German Grandpa used to say, "A little is enough and enough is too much!" I'm sticking with Google.
Posted by: DianaGainer | January 16, 2009 8:13 AM
Ouch, sounds like you've been unfortunate! Mostly it's not at all that bad. Though I've finally given up trying to do something about the Falun Gong entry. Damn cultists.
Posted by: Martin R | January 16, 2009 8:18 AM
DianaGainer,
I just went to Wikipedia. I didn't look up Black English, but a search for Ebonic turned up a wealth of information, complete with footnotes and links, all quite accurate as far as I could tell. (The only sour note was I got redirected to "Ebonics", a ridiculous name for a language.)
Have you been back to check up on it lately?
Posted by: Riman Butterbur | January 18, 2009 12:33 AM
I've been editing for more than 4 years and have made over 5000 contributions. The problem is that the more work I do the more I realise has to be done. Please come and help, it is a great way to stimulate your brain.
Posted by: trey | January 19, 2009 7:15 AM