Now on ScienceBlogs: Surveying the "integrative medicine" landscape (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Aardvarchaeology

Jungle-Covered Impact Crater

Our planet just another crater-pocked space rock, though here surface erosion acts much faster than on nearby worlds, and we have plate tectonics, all obscuring the impact scars.

Profile

Martin Rundkvist Dr. Martin Rundkvist is a Swedish archaeologist, journal editor, public speaker, chairman of the Swedish Skeptics Society, atheist, lefty liberal, bookworm, and father of two.

Order Mead-halls of the Eastern Geats
Order merchandise

Martin's Amazon.CO.UK Wish List

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

« Beautiful Vendel Period Jewellery | Main | Weekend Fun: Books and Games »

Jungle-Covered Impact Crater

Category: Space
Posted on: February 27, 2010 8:20 AM, by Martin R

Vichada1.jpg

The Vichada river in Colombia is a tributary of the Orinoco. In 2004 part-time geologist Max Rocca discovered that it skirts South America's largest impact crater. It measures 50 km in diameter, nearly a third of the Chicxulub crater caused by the space rock that killed off the non-avian dinos.

This image visualises two important things.

1. Our planet is just another crater-pocked space rock, though here surface erosion acts much faster than on nearby worlds, and we have plate tectonics, all obscuring the impact scars. The Vichada example is a recent one, being less than 30 million years old.

2. Geological time is looong. Look at that meandering river doing a little detour around the crater's edge!

There's a good feature piece on the Vichada crater at the Planetary Society's web site.


Show larger map

[More blog entries about , , , ; , , , .]

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Physical Science

Comments

1

I opened up google earth to see what it looked like without odd false coloring stuff. Didn't expect it'd be as easy to find as it is. A huge pock mark.
Jungle covered inside yes, looks marshy too, the rim is mostly uncovered. There's a lot of slash and burn going on in the area, if I'm reading the picture right.

Posted by: Stacy L Mason | February 27, 2010 10:46 AM

2

There was nothing in the linked article about dating this feature.

Any chance that the Vichada crater could be the result of a mass which separated from the Chicxulub impactor?

Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | March 1, 2010 12:59 PM

3

Apparently not. I got the date from here.

Posted by: Martin R | March 1, 2010 1:11 PM

4

And the date of the impact has some relation with extinctions on southamerica?

Posted by: Edgar | March 1, 2010 2:07 PM

5

That would be interesting to learn. I don't know, except that there hasn't been a major extinction event since the dino-killing K/T one. Unless you count the one going on right now because of humans.

Posted by: Martin R | March 1, 2010 2:55 PM

6

What about the Swedish impact crater?

Posted by: Sigmund | March 1, 2010 4:00 PM

7

Lake Siljan. That rock struck 365 mya according to Wikipedia.

Posted by: Martin R | March 1, 2010 4:34 PM

8

Martin: About South American extinctions and regarding Edgar's question consider this text,
"The South American mammalian fauna of the late Pleistocene-early Holocene (Lujanian Land-mammal Age) is considered impressive relative to any modern or extinct mammalian fauna (Patterson & Pascual 1972; Simpson 1980). Among the more than one hundred and twenty genera compiled in Marshall et al. (1984), the estimated adult masses of 38 extinct herbivore genera exceeded 100 kg; about 20 of them were megaherbivores, that is, their masses were measured in megagrams, or metric tonnes (Owen-Smith 1988). No other fossil mammalian fauna is known to contain that number of megaherbivores. In contrast, the whole African continent, indisputably the most diverse mammal fauna known today, has only four species of megaherbivores: the African elephant (Loxodonta africana), the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum), the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), and the hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius). A fifth species, the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), might also be considered as belonging to this category. The Lujanian mammalian megafauna appears to be more comparable to dinosaur faunas, which of course had species of even larger body size. But even these dinosaur faunas not very often contained so many large-bodied species in a relatively short span of time and a limited area."
The Farina paper concerns the Lujanian, which was the last age before the recent. See SLAMA in the Wikipedia.

These extinctions are much more recent than 30my, and the inferred causes include us.

Posted by: Don | March 2, 2010 11:05 AM

9

So ... I think I am seeing this around +4° 30' 20.34", -69° 9' 42.88" Is this correct?

Posted by: Dave Stott | March 4, 2010 12:39 PM

10

Looks right to me!

Posted by: Martin R | March 5, 2010 4:39 AM

11

Perhaps this formation is related to the impact crater at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay.

I suppose that only further investigations will result in better dating and analysis of the impactor.

E.P. Grondine
Man and Impact in the Americas

Posted by: E.P. Grondine | March 9, 2010 6:08 PM

12

Right now the extent of the YD impacts is not known. The South American excavations linked through here may have some bearing on the problem:

http://www.palanth.com/legacy/index.php/topic,1202.0.html

If the Vichada River impact is related to the Chesapeake Bay one, we should also be seeing South American extinctions around 35 million years ago.

E.P. Grondine
Man and Impact in the Americas

Posted by: E.P. Grondine | March 9, 2010 6:19 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





eXTReMe Tracker

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.