i-b131168b4562c440d9fddc801028dc95-bobglind500.jpg

The most dedicated man in Swedish fringe archaeology is at it again. I’ve reported on and off about Bob G. Lind’s antics in Scania (12345), but it’s been a while now. I didn’t write about the time when he interpreted a dotted line on an old map as an alignment of standing stones that had been removed, nor about his recent statement to the effect that his new discoveries would topple the current Swedish government once he presented them. But now Bob’s made the news again and Ystads Allehanda has the story.

Ystad municipality has temporarily cancelled its guided tours of the Ales stenar stone ship (a Late Iron Age grave monument), reported Bob to the police for threatening and harassing the site guides, and hired a security guard. Bob believes that this particular stone ship is a Late Bronze Age calendaric observatory, and he’s run a loud and aggressive one-man presentation at the site for many years. It seems that his interest is currently not directed towards his other project, where he interprets a nearby Early Iron Age cemetery as yet another Late Bronze Age calendaric observatory.

Thanks to Anders Ljungberg for the tip-off.

[More about , ; , .]

Comments

  1. #1 tamakazura
    July 14, 2010

    Is there a point where you lose the title of Archaeologist and get demoted to Quack Historian?
    Because if these people have higher education they don’t seem to be utilising it much…

  2. #2 Martin R
    July 14, 2010

    It’s kind of hard to classify Bob. I don’t want to call him an amateur archaeologist or weekend archaeologist, because that’s what I call the excellent people I collaborate with. Purveyor of wild theories, perhaps. He’s a practicing homeopath and has had no archaeological training.

  3. #3 Bob Carlson
    July 14, 2010

    On a page for his book titled Ales Stenar Lind calls himself a scientist in the field of archeoastronomy. I gather that his promoting of ancient Swedish cemeteries as calendric observatories is tantamount to raising their status to that of little Stonehenges. In any case, I’ve known for years that you’ve got to watch out for those guys named Bob.

  4. #4 Martin R
    July 14, 2010

    Archaeoastronomy is a small legitimate subfield shared by archaeology and astronomy. Two of Sweden’s most prominent archaeoastronomical practitioners have studied Lind’s work and found it to lack all merit.

  5. #5 Phillip IV
    July 14, 2010

    Martin R @ #2:

    He’s a practicing homeopath and has had no archaeological training.

    Ah, that probably explains it! He’s a homeopath, so he likely believes that his theories get more powerful the more he dilutes the facts.

  6. #6 Bob O'H
    July 14, 2010

    I didn’t write about the time when he interpreted a dotted line on an old map as an alignment of standing stones that had been removed,

    Hahahhahahahahahahahaha

    *breath*

    Hahahhahahahahaaaaa

    nor about his recent statement to the effect that his new discoveries would topple the current Swedish government once he presented them

    I can believe it would – they’d all be falling over laughing.

  7. #7 Mattias
    July 14, 2010

    Do archeoastronomers study the history of astromical and astrological reception in human civilisations or do they study cosmology and astronomy from the period before the point of earliest available data?

    / Mattias

  8. #8 eleanora
    July 15, 2010

    tamakazura: Is there a point where you lose the title of Archaeologist and get demoted to Quack Historian?

    Martin: He’s a practicing homeopath and has had no archaeological training.

    Perhaps the term for him should be quack archaeopath.

  9. #9 Martin R
    July 15, 2010

    According to R.M. Sinclair, archaeoastronomy is the study of how people “have understood the phenomena in the sky, how they used phenomena in the sky and what role the sky played in their cultures”. In practice, it’s often about the orientations of various archaeological features toward celestial events. The most robust kind of archaeoastronomy, in my opinion, is the one where you look at trends in the orientation of large classes of structure, not at lines and angles at a single site like Bob Lind does.

  10. #10 ranggaw0636
    July 15, 2010

    why they catch him, it’s fun to watch people make fun of himself

  11. #11 Martin R
    July 15, 2010

    The people he threatened and harassed didn’t find it very funny.

  12. #12 Sandgroper
    July 15, 2010

    “The most robust kind of archaeoastronomy, in my opinion, is the one where you look at trends in the orientation of large classes of structure” – like Greek temples, for example? I have been struck by how Scandinavian Iron Age grave structures seem to have been located more to capture terrestrial attention. But there is an obvious distinction between location and orientation, although presumably they are somehow at least to some extent interrelated.

    Well, we have all heard of naturopaths, homeopaths, sociopaths and psychopaths, so why not an archaeopath?

    Australia has its paleoanthropaths, so I don’t see why Sweden should be spared its fair share of lunacy. But in truth, I don’t wish it on you, I wish you could be spared.

    Signed John Sandgroper, Independent, Totally Unqualified and Irrational (not to mention Lazy and Shamelessly Opportunistic) Researcherpath.

    :)

  13. #13 Martin R
    July 15, 2010

    Yes, Greek temples are an excellent example. My buddy Alun Salt recently presented his dissertation on that topic.

    I wish to become a gardenpath.

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.