In the comments to my interview with DarkSyde, another parent and I discussed “alternative” medicine and some of the autism literature. Today over on Respectful Insolence, Orac has an excellent post on how using data from the VAERS database isn’t the best way to accurately gauge adverse effects.

A bit of background on VAERS: this is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. If you or your child has a bad reaction to a vaccine–a serious illness after receiving it, an unexpected side effect, etc.–they’re the folks you contact to report it. These adverse effects are then analyzed to see if they’re being reported more frequently than would be expected due to chance alone. (For example, it’s simply a fact of life that some people will become ill, or even die, within a few days of receiving a vaccine–especially if it’s a vaccine in wide use. VAERS and other data can be used to investigate whether these reactions are likely due to the shot itself, or are simply a chance event). However, VAERS is subject to a lot of biases in design. First, it’s designed to allow self-reports, and it will accept pretty much anything the reporter submits as an “adverse event.” Orac links to a story where a woman reported to VAERS that a vaccine had turned her into the Incredible Hulk–and it could have stayed in the database if she’d not given them permission to remove it. This is good in a way–it’s better to be broad and overly-inclusive than to dismiss reported side effects. But any type of self-reporting brings a bias to the study. For example, those who are more wary of vaccines may be more likely to report side effects than those who have more confidence in them. And, as Orac points out, potential lawsuits appear to be driving up the number of side effects reported to VAERS–a reason to be skeptical of evidence used from that database to support a connection between vaccination and thimerosal.

, ,

Comments

  1. #1 IndianCowboy
    February 6, 2006

    There’s also an issue in that as far as I (and the doctors I’ve talked to) know, doctors can’t report to VAERS. And if they can, they’re not aware of it.

    I developed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (type II) after a hepatitis vaccination. I wasn’t aware of VAERS; my mother, a doctor, wasn’t aware of VAERS; and the 4 neurologists I’ve seen since haven’t mentioned it.

    CRPS is known to affect adolescents disproportionately and its, well, not very fun. However even though every doctor i’ve seen guessed immediately that not only a vaccine, but a HEPATITIS vaccine, caused it (wihtout me telling them), it’s still not acknowledged openly.

  2. #2 Joseph O'Donnell
    February 7, 2006

    Actually now I think of it Tara, you’d really get a kick out of the fact here in New Zealand, we’re having the most aggressive vaccine follow up done pretty much anywhere. CARM (Center for Adverse Reactions Monitoring) has been following the Meningococcal B vaccine rollout over the whole country. In general they’ve found what everyone pretty much expected, that severe reactions to the vaccine are highly uncommon and most side effects are minor.

    It’s worth noting that this is regulated by health professionals, so that means GPs and the like and not self reporting. They still report just about everything however, but they properly ascribe symptoms to the vaccine or something else usually. The full data set will probably be assembled and released after the MeNZB campaign has finished, but tidbits are available (though I can’t find anything up to date at the moment).

  3. #3 Tara
    February 7, 2006

    Interesting. There’s a form right on the VAERS homepage addressed to health care providers, so AFAIK, they should be able to report. I wonder how much mention this kind of thing gets in med school.

  4. #4 IndianCowboy
    February 7, 2006

    I’ll let you know if it ever gets mentioned. I’m only in my 2nd semester, though.

Current ye@r *