So, I watched the SuperBowl last night (mandatory, I think, 'cause Ben Roethlisberger's from my tiny little hometown) and saw this FedEx commercial, which has humans living amongst T. rexes and pterodactyls. Can't wait to see this posted on Answers in Genesis as more proof that people are increasingly being swayed to the "truth" of their message--and during the biggest television event of the year, no less! They're probably being showered with donations to their Creation museum even as I write.
Aetiology
Discussing causes, origins, evolution, and implications of disease and other phenomena.
Profile
Tara C. Smith is an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology. Her research involves a number of pathogens at the animal-human nexus. She also writes for The Panda's Thumb and previously for WIRED SCIENCE's Correlations. Please note the views expressed on this site are Dr. Smith's alone and may not be representative of the groups mentioned above.
"...a veritable expert on tawdry cosmetic procedures gone horribly awry..."--Kevin Beck
Follow Tara on Twitter
Search
Recent Posts
- Great Plains Emerging Diseases Conference
- Infectious disease epidemiology and zombies
- MRSA in pork products: does the "antibiotic-free" label make a difference?
- Castrating sheep with teeth: not a good idea (with video!)
- Is the HPV vaccine "weak science?" (Hint: no)
- Climate change and public health
- Does bestiality increase your risk of penile cancer?
- MRSA found in Iowa meat
- Another advantage of blogging
- Chickenpox parties--just a Facebook friend away
Recent Comments
- Johnny RN/EMT on Administration: overdose antidote not good public health policy
- gingerest on Infectious disease epidemiology and zombies
- Atif (Mr Epidemiology) on Infectious disease epidemiology and zombies
- Eric Lofgren on Infectious disease epidemiology and zombies
- Alyson Kelvin on Infectious disease epidemiology and zombies
- Deborah on Scarlet fever--past and present
- afrika mangosu on MRSA in pork products: does the "antibiotic-free" label make a difference?
- david on Fecal transplants to cure Clostridium difficile infection
- medschneverends on Is the HPV vaccine "weak science?" (Hint: no)
- Kaleberg on MRSA in pork products: does the "antibiotic-free" label make a difference?
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- May 2005
Infectious Disease Series
« Time magazine on politics & science | Main | Proceed with caution when mining VAERS »
Creationists win support of FedEx
Category: Humor
Posted on: February 6, 2006 12:30 PM, by Tara C. Smith
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/850
Comments
I was thinking along the same lines when I saw that commercial. I enjoyed it from an entertainment standpoint, but couldn't help thinking it would allow the erroneous notion of humans and dinosaurs coexisting to continue, thereby confusing those scientifically illiterate folks and furthering bolstering the IDists claims.
Posted by: ericnh
| February 6, 2006 12:47 PM
But if the Intelligent Designer had humans living among pterodactyls and apatasaurs, then why didn't he/she/it also design FedEx at the same time?
Posted by: Dave Munger | February 6, 2006 12:55 PM
I was screaming at the TV, and my friends all got a good kick out of that. I never saw the commercial for that energy drink that was supposedly offensive to truckers aired, but somehow we had fedex get by with the bad cavemen and dinos? We should have been on top of it. I mean really, a sabertooth and a mammoth could have been just as effective. Sigh.
Posted by: megan | February 6, 2006 12:56 PM
I have to admit I winced at first, but it won me over by the end. I think, perhaps, that the misconception of people and dinosaurs cohabitating the earth was part of the joke, more an homage to Gary Larson than a wink to creationists. Wishful thinking, perhaps. Besides, we can't go worrying about what "they" are going to do with stuff like this too much. Use the misconception as an educational opportunity, then the humor works to the advantage of science. Just a thought.
Posted by: Brad Hoge | February 6, 2006 1:15 PM
You joke, but I saw AiG put out a dismissive PR note when the kids cartoon movie Ice Age came out.
I think most of their angst was spent on The Flintstones though.
Posted by: Dave S.
| February 6, 2006 1:19 PM
Silly Dave. "Intelligent design" doesn't necessarily mean *optimal* design, as any IDist will tell you.
Oh, I think it's that as well. Hence the "humor" designation for the post rather than an actual serious category. I'll laugh my ass off if they do mention it, though.
Posted by: Tara
| February 6, 2006 1:28 PM
Posted by: Dave Munger | February 6, 2006 1:57 PM
May I point out that those in the commercial were not Homo sapiens, and that FedEX didn't exist, yet. Thus, there is the implication that FedEx is the result of intelligent designed by evolved humans ;)
Posted by: Gerardo Camilo | February 6, 2006 1:59 PM
Wouldn't creationists use G.O.D. instead of FedEx anyway? http://www.hankstruckpictures.com/pix/trucks/paul_kane/pk_volvo_god_sml.jpg
Maybe since they're based in Newark, they aren't known elsewhere, but I saw them all the time growing up.
Posted by: archmeg
| February 6, 2006 2:13 PM
Heh. Hadn't seen them before.
Posted by: Tara
| February 6, 2006 2:25 PM
Come on, lighten up a bit. It was just a commercial, and a pretty funny one as well. If IDiots mention it as "evidence" that ID or creationism is becoming more accepted, it'll just make them look stupid.
Posted by: Orac | February 6, 2006 2:49 PM
Bothered me too. When I brought it up to the people I was watching the game with (many biologists, and all scientists), they told me to shut up.
Posted by: RPM
| February 6, 2006 8:52 PM
"Wouldn't creationists use G.O.D. instead of FedEx anyway?"
They may do, but would they admit it in public?
Bob
Posted by: Bob O'H | February 7, 2006 1:20 AM