I’ve mentioned previously the “hygiene hypothesis”, but don’t think I’ve ever really discussed it. SEED writer Emily Anthes has a new article on the topic at the homepage.
Interesting articles (although I’m not sure the writer of the first one linked really means “microorganisms” in all cases) but they both miss what I thought was the most fascinating aspect of the work with intestinal worms. Challenges to the human immune system are one benefit, perhaps, but the fact that these worms have been shown to actively alter the response of our immune systems is the real ‘wow’ idea for me.
Carl Zimmer’s book “Parasite Rex” has a good explanation of this concept.
Interesting overview. I particularly enjoyed, “You don’t want to trade sniffles for typhoid”.
I’ve never seen the suggestion about the possible relationship to changes in diet before – this should be testable in those countries that have (comparatively recently) adopted more processed foods into their diets.
Thanks for posting to this.
Regards – Shinga
Notify me of followup comments via E-Mail.
My first article at The Guardian is up: No, Ebola in Dallas does not mean you and…
Everything old is new again. For years on this blog, I wrote about HIV denial and…
Have a new article up at Slate. Nine months into the worst-ever Ebola outbreak, here’s where…
Gregg Mitman’s article in the September 17th New England Journal of Medicine, “Ebola in a Stew…
I’m happy to welcome Dr. Heather Lander to the blogosphere and Twitterverse. She’s a virologist who has done work…