Now on ScienceBlogs: Weekend Recap: My Annular Eclipse Expedition!

Subscribe for $15 to National Geographic Magazine

Aetiology

Discussing causes, origins, evolution, and implications of disease and other phenomena.

Profile

Tara C. Smith is an Associate Professor of Epidemiology. Her research involves a number of pathogens at the animal-human nexus. She also writes for The Panda's Thumb and previously for WIRED SCIENCE's Correlations. Please note the views expressed on this site are Dr. Smith's alone and may not be representative of the groups mentioned above.

"...a veritable expert on tawdry cosmetic procedures gone horribly awry..."--Kevin Beck

Follow Tara on Twitter

or Facebook.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Infectious Disease Series

« New Pediatrics Grand Rounds! | Main | Viral eradication and the evolution of smallpox »

HIV and responsible journalism

Category: AIDS/HIVPublic healthScience educationSkepticismVarious viruses
Posted on: August 13, 2006 6:45 PM, by Tara C. Smith

If I could have been at this week's conference for one session, it would have been this morning's symposium on AIDS denial and responsible journalism. Hannah has already mentioned it and given her impressions and thoughts. The session itself was moderated by HIV researcher Daniel Kuritzkes and journalist Laurie Garrett, currently a Senior Fellow on Global Health at the Council on Foreign Relations. Talks were also given by HIV researcher John Moore, South Africa-based science journalist Tamar Khan, Toronto Star science reporter Kim Honey, and Nathan Geffen of the Treatment Action Campaign. From Hannah's report, it seems there was quite a bit of audience involvement as well.

The issue of reporters and how they address the "controversy" over HIV is one that has implications for fields far beyond just HIV science. Hannah noted that a debate opened up discussing whether journalists should challenge scientific consensus in general. She notes that Lancet editor Richard Horton:

(Continued at The AIDS conference blog...)

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/18525

Comments

1

Don't forget to read Celia Farber's superb expose of the corruption and dangerous mischief of the AIDS dogmatists that appeared in the March 2006 issue of "Harpers."

There were some fine follow-up debates among the letters published in the May 2006 issue of "Harpers" in response to Farber's powerful article.

Ditto with BBC filmmaker Joan Shenton and her equally fine book, "Positively False: Exposing the Myths Around HIV and AIDS" (St. Marrtin's Press, 1998).

It's truly amazing how just a few such books and articles have such an amazingly disproportionate, disconcerting and destabilizing effect on the true believers of the Church of AIDS Dogmatism........... it does gives one grounds to pause all right......

Lordy, Lordy.......

Posted by: Charles | August 15, 2006 1:34 PM

2

The thread that connects those HIV+s who question whether HIV causes AIDS and those that don't, is that they're both trying to stay alive. If I had not become sick 6-10 years after testing positive and saw the people on HAART who look like concentration camp victims I wouldn't want to take the drugs. Or, if HAART had saved my life I would be a true beiever. What a hateful choice.

Posted by: James | August 17, 2006 3:40 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.