Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Aetiology

Discussing causes, origins, evolution, and implications of disease and other phenomena.

Profile

Tara C. Smith is an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology. Her research involves a number of pathogens at the animal-human nexus. She also writes for The Panda's Thumb and previously for WIRED SCIENCE's Correlations. Please note the views expressed on this site are Dr. Smith's alone and may not be representative of the groups mentioned above.

"...a veritable expert on tawdry cosmetic procedures gone horribly awry..."--Kevin Beck

Follow Tara on Twitter

or Facebook.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Infectious Disease Series

« One more "don't miss" post | Main | "Random quotes"--SB game of the week »

IDists make another bonehead move

Category: Intelligent design/creationism
Posted on: August 20, 2006 9:00 AM, by Tara C. Smith

So, the Discovery Institute is planning the "largest conference on Intelligent Design ever held," sponsored by Physicians for Scientific Integrity (yeah, this group I wrote about previously) and being held in Florida in two parts--late September and early November. In the latter portion (held in a church, of course--but nooo, it's all science, not religion), they claim to be hosting "The Great Debate." Who's it between, you ask? Nick Matzke has the answer:

Featuring: Dr. Stephen Meyer, Ph.D. in philosophy of science, Cambridge University and Dr. Donald Duh, professor (emeritus) at Whatever State University

Oopsie. Did someone send out the wrong draft of the announcement? This shows just the kind of joke these debates can be, and their circus potential, especially in a venue like this where the deck is stacked against science and in favor of creationism. Luckily, Nick has some wise words:

Anyhoo, if the announcement for the creationism/ID debate, before you are even signed up, describes you as "Dr. Donald Duh, professor (emeritus) at Whatever State University", then maybe, just maybe, this is a debate you should refrain from participating in.

It seems that they've not yet filled the role of Dr. Duh, so it'll be interesting to see whether anyone decides to self-flagellate and step into the spot.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/19173

Comments

1

Hopefully, they'll have trouble filling Dr Duh's place now, since whoever did fill it would doubtless pick up the moniker.

Posted by: Mike | August 20, 2006 5:33 PM

2

I am Dr. Duh. We are all Dr. Duh!

Posted by: somnilista, FCD | August 21, 2006 10:27 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.