Now on ScienceBlogs: Weekend Recap: My Annular Eclipse Expedition!

Subscribe for $15 to National Geographic Magazine

Aetiology

Discussing causes, origins, evolution, and implications of disease and other phenomena.

Profile

Tara C. Smith is an Associate Professor of Epidemiology. Her research involves a number of pathogens at the animal-human nexus. She also writes for The Panda's Thumb and previously for WIRED SCIENCE's Correlations. Please note the views expressed on this site are Dr. Smith's alone and may not be representative of the groups mentioned above.

"...a veritable expert on tawdry cosmetic procedures gone horribly awry..."--Kevin Beck

Follow Tara on Twitter

or Facebook.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Infectious Disease Series

« Microbiology pioneer dies | Main | Can't decide a controversial area via science? Legislate the answer! »

Must-read post

Category: EcologyGeneral EpidemiologyHistorical studies of diseaseInfectious diseaseInfluenzaPublic healthVarious bacteriaVarious viruses
Posted on: December 1, 2006 1:00 PM, by Tara C. Smith

Revere over at Effect Measure has an excellent post linking together the current bird flu situation with John Snow's investigations of 19th century cholera outbreaks. It's an interesting take on the situation--check it out.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/27032

Comments

1

What's the connection with bird flu?

There is no connection. Read a book about early industrial revolution and the extremely difficult conditions of the poor and anybody with a normal brain can understand that decaying organic matter and waste were certainly not the most difficult problems the poor had to handle.
19th century London cholera has nothing to do with 21st century avian flu. The avian flu pandemic is a stupid hoax invented by WHO and other officials who simply swap labels here and there to make their cases look the way they want them to look.

What? Hundred of millions of dead birds? Yeah, killed by men. One chicken infected, a hundred thousand slaughtered.

JS
--

Posted by: jspreen | December 1, 2006 1:24 PM

2

JS: LOL. There were a lot of people with "normal brains" in the 19th century who didn't think it was as obvious as you do. I would be interested to know what you think the biggest problems of the poor were. And what did 19h century cholera in London "have to do with"? Just curious. As for your WHO et al. paranoia, what does that have to do with? Just asking someone with a normal brain, of course.

Posted by: revere | December 1, 2006 1:53 PM

3

One parallel is clear.

It might have reflected a moral failing or secret sinfulness of the victim, or a moral failing in a society that allowed poor people to live in such squalor.

That really sounds familiar. Vibrio cholerae? Not when you can apply Calvinism!

Posted by: Robster | December 1, 2006 1:59 PM

4

Just a note for the uninitiated--jspreen is our resident germ theory denier. Heaven forbid he actually would go and read Revere's post before he spouted off on it...

Posted by: Tara C. Smith | December 1, 2006 3:23 PM

5

Just a note for the uninitiated--jspreen is our resident germ theory denier.

I think this link is even better!


Posted by: jspreen | December 1, 2006 5:54 PM

6

Tara: First, thanks for the post. Second, thanks for the diagnosis of JS. He/she/it/they posted the same comment on EM but I didn't bother to answer. Now I'm glad I didn't. Sorry for feeding the troll.

Posted by: revere | December 1, 2006 10:24 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.