Seed Media Group

Afarensis

Anthropology, Evolution and Science

Search

Profile

afarcomp3.jpg Afarensis is a 3.5-2.8 million year old hominin from the Kada Hadar member of the Hadar formation in the Middle Awash, Ethiopia. He is approximately 41 inches tall, weighs approximately 60 pounds and has a cranial capacity of a whopping 410 cc (approximately). Afarensis is currently considered to be transitional between apes and humans and displays some traits of both. Since he spends a lot of time on the couch watching monster movies, some observers question whether he is an obligate biped (although no one has observed him climbing a tree). He also has a blog called Transitions:The Evolution of Life His previous blog can be found here.
My blog banners were designed by pough - frequent commenter and Photoshop wizard, Bill Clark, and Chris Whitehouse. Thanks, you all do excellent Photoshop work!

My Amazon Wishlist

Other Information

Open%20Laboratory%20cover%20image.jpg Order the Book!
image
moonbat%202.jpg
  • Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
  • Moonbat courtesy of Creek Running North

    featured in openlab 2006
    View My Openlab Entry Openlab 2007
    View My Openlab Entry

    Recent Posts

    Categories

    Recent Comments

    Archives

    Aphorisms


    "Loyalty to petrified opinion never broke a chain or freed a human soul..."
    Mark Twain


    "Ideology is a poor substitute for rational thought..."
    Afarensis


    "It isn't faith that makes good science...it's curiosity"
    Prof. Jacob Barnhardt, The Day the Earth Stood Still


    "This man wishes to be accorded the same privilege as a sponge. He wishes to think!"
    Clarence Darrow, Inherit the Wind


    "...I become fearful when I see people substituting fear for reason..."
    Klaatu, The Day the Earth Stood Still


    "I want you to grab life by its little bunny ears and get in its face..."
    The Simpsons


    "This is between me and the vegetable..."
    Seymour Krelborn, The Little Shop of Horrors


    "There are bad laws and cruel laws and the people who enforce them are both bad and cruel..."
    Thea, Isle of the Dead


    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably." Jean- Luc Picard, Star Trek: The Next Generation

    "But the limit of tolerance for these human foibles is obtained when the proponent of a questionable scientific doctrine endeavors to maintain it against all possible odds by misrepresentation, misinformation and suppression of contradictory data, and by insinuating unfairness in opponents of his views."
    Franz Weidenreich, Morphology of Solo Man


    "Man stands alone in the universe, a unique product of a long, unconcious, impersonal material process with unique understanding and potentialities. These he owes to no one but himself, and it is to himself that he is responsible. He is not the creature of uncontrollable and undeterminable forces, but his own master. He can and must decide and manage his own destiny."
    George Gaylord Simpson, Life of the Past


    Yeah he's the Dick to the Dawk to the phd, he's smarter than you he's got a science degree! Yeah he's the Dick to the Dawk to the phd, he's smarter than you he's got a science degree!
    Unknown

    Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you.
    Frederich Nietzsche


    But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
    The Declaration of Independence



    View My Stats

    « Turtle Power | Main | Squirrels And Rattlesnakes »

    The Upright Ape: A New Origin of the Species

    Category: Book ReviewEvolutionGeneticsPaleoanthropology
    Posted on: August 13, 2007 12:30 PM, by afarensis, FCD

    The rest of posterior basicranial growth in nonhuman primates occurs through posterior drift of the foramen magnum, which has been shown by fluorochrome dye labeling experiments to migrate caudally in nonhuman primates through resorption at its posterior end and deposition at its anterior end (Michejda, 1971; Giles et al., 1981). In contrast, the foramen magnum remains in the center of the human skull base, roughly halfway between the most anterior and posterior points of the skull (Lugoba and Wood, 1990).

    The Primate Cranial Base: Ontogeny, Function, and Integration
    Lieberman, Ross, and Ravosa
    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 43:117-169 (2000)


    The posterior drift of the foramen magnum in nonhuman primates is controlled by Hox genes - or at least that is what we infer based on studies in mice. There are a few studies, but not many, that seek to integrate recent developments in evo-devo into paleoanthropology. There are none that seek to integrate modularity theory into paleoanthropology

    Upright%20Ape.jpg
    So I was quite happy to receive a copy of The Upright Ape: A New Origin of the Species by Aaron G. Filler. The Upright Ape is a well written, sometimes polemical, attempt to combine recent advances in genetics, evo-devo and paleoanthropology into a theory about bipedality. Although the aim of the book is to explain the origins of bipedality, it actually ranges over a wide variety of fields. The first couple of chapters are devoted to the vertebral theory suggested by Goethe, the adventures of Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire in Egypt (and the impact of Egyptian iconography on his thought), and Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire's idea about the inversion of the dorsal-ventral axis in vertebrates. The next three chapters discuss chromosomal speciation, taxonomy and homology, and modular selection theory. These chapters form the foundation for the final four chapters where Filler attempts to explain five major events in the history of life. These five events are the Cambrian Explosion, the origin of the vertebrates, the appearance of the dinosaurs, the mammalian diversification, and the origins of bipedality. For Filler all of these events share a common denominator. Namely a change in body plan that is ultimately related to Hox genes acting on higher order modules, such as the somites.

    One example will have to suffice. Morotopithecus is a large bodied species of primate dating to the early Miocene (approximately 20.6 MYA). Morotopithecus has been called enigmatic because of its wide variety of traits, some of which link it to primitive catarrhines, others to modern hominoids. Cranially, em>Morotopithecus is characterized by a narrow interorbital region, broad nasal aperature, broad palate, pronounced canine jugum, long snout and short maxilla. Dentally it is characterized by procumbent incisors, large, sexually dimorphic canines, large quadrate molars (both primitive catarrhine traits), and broad premolars (such as in extant apes). Postcranially Morotopithecus has a rounded and superiorly expanded glenoid fossa (similar to a chimps), the articular surface on the head of the femur resembles that of monkeys (suggesting lesser ability to engage in abducted postures), a broad, shallow patellar grove, and thick diaphyseal cortical bone in the femur. The lumbar vertebrae share a number of features with modern hominoids such as a caudally inclined spinous process and a transverse process that arises from the pedicle. The lumbar vertebrae are also cranio-caudally long (unlike in modern hominoids). In most mammals, including hylobatids the lumbar transverse process is serially homologous with the rib. Most mammals, including lemurs, monkeys, hylobatids, and Proconsul africanus have a styloid process on their lumbar vertebrae. Humans, great apes and Morotopithecus don't. Filler argues that the reason for this is because the transverse process had switched and become serially homologous with the spinous process (well, with the structures giving rise to the spinous process). This indicates a fundamental body plan change - it moves, for example, the muscle attachments away from the midline increasing their leverage. It also allows for more upright posture. In the case of Morotopithecus more upright posture means fully bipedal. This has certain implications for the way apes and humans evolved (apes evolved away from bipedality - hence knuckle-walking is derived and bipedality the primitive condition) and Filler doesn't shy away from spelling these issues out.

    For a book with only 260 pages Filler manages to pack an amazing amount of information into it, his discussion of the effects of rib and spine morphology among dinosaurs and mammals is a good example. At the same time the book doesn't suffer, in terms of readability, because of that. Although I can't say that I agree with everything in the book (leaving Morotopithecus aside, chromosomal speciation is on shaky ground, for example) I will echo Pilbeam, from the introduction, and say that this is a challenging and provocative book well worth reading.

    Comments

    Neat. I can't be the only one who has wondered for years of knuckle-walking wasn't recently derived.
    But if gorillas split off from the original bipedal-ape line before chimpanzees did, how can they both have the same derived feature?

    Posted by: hoary puccoon | August 14, 2007 6:10 AM

    Parallelism. Compare the skeletons of spider monkeys and gibbons, they share some of the same traits, in this case adaptations to brachiating and suspensory behavior. It also could be, to a greater or lesser extent, constraint, There may be only a few different ways you can go from bipedalism. That would be my guess anyway.

    Posted by: afarensis, FCD | August 14, 2007 5:42 PM

    Several things:

    This has implications for the proposed split date between Homo and Pan: those six & seven MY old skeletons that look upright may have split from the common ancestor earlier.

    I don't like his notion that hylobatids derive from a lineage that reversed the mutation (although I admit it's possible). I would be more comfortable with an earlier split. He seems to be putting too much credence in hard dates from the "molecular clock".

    Re speciation, a single event involving two chromosomes would produce a 75% lethality in backbreeding from F1 to either parent as well as inbreeding among F1's. This is a high barrier, but not uncrossable.

    I see no reason why a population could not have become and remained dimorphic for the lumbar mutation for several MY's, given the appropriate conditions and life strategies. This would have given time for more usual types of speciation.

    However, several types of "instant" speciation are described or implied in Speciation by Jerry A. Coyne and H. Allen Orr. This is the best I've seen on the subject.

    Of course, we still have the issue of shoulders adapted for brachiation. How likely is it that this was parallel evolution? Could a single population (or species) have remained dimorphic for both conditions for long enough to have branched out into the various forms found in the fossil record>

    Finally, I can't find any discussion of the combined implications with Homo Floresiensis. Could this be the result of separate evolution from the common ancestor?

    Posted by: AK | September 26, 2007 9:51 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





    Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

    Blogs in the Network

    Top Five: Most German

    Search All Blogs

    Science News From:

    Science News from NYTimes.com