Now on ScienceBlogs: The Chicago Tribune: Telling it like it is about the antivaccine autism "biomed" movement

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Profile

AngryToxicologist is a scientist in the public health sector, knows plenty about toxicology, and is occasionally angry about it all. Drop me a line at tox@angrytoxicologist.com.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Useless and Random

Any money I would have gotten from writing this blog is donated to the National Capital Poison Control Center. They rely on grants, save lives, and decrease health care costs. So read this blog every day!

What I'm reading, watching, and rating:

SawMichael Clayton*** out of 5

ReadMiddlesex**** out of 5

SawThe Lives of Others***** out of 5. Best movie I've seen in a long time.

« Hello CPSC, these are peoples' lives! | Main | Live from Seattle: It's the Society of Toxicology! »

Pfizer drug can cause heart failure. Gee, ya think?

Category: Media
Posted on: February 14, 2008 10:27 AM, by angrytoxicologist

From the non-news that's news' department, Reuters reproted on a study that showed that ~15% of patients who took Sutent, a kidney and cancer drug, developed heart failure. Dr Melinda Telli presented information on 48 patients who took Sutent at an American Society of Clinical Oncology. You'd think this was new information the way it's being reported (WaPost, CNNMoney, ETC). Of course, if anyone had been reading the label of the drug, they'd find this under 'Precautions':

In the two MRCC studies, twenty-five patients (15%) had decreases in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to below the lower limit of normal (LLN). In GIST Study A, 22 patients (11%) on SUTENT and 3 patients (3%) on placebo had treatment-emergent LVEF values below the LLN.

and in bold

Physicians are advised to weigh this risk against the potential benefits of the drug. These patients should be carefully monitored for clinical signs and symptoms of CHF while receiving SUTENT.

First question: Why do this study? Did the researcher never read the label which referred to a much bigger study with the same finding?

Second question: Why is anyone reporting on this non-news? "Drug. heart-failure. must print." Thankfully, not everyone is (Kudos to NYTimes, USAToday, LATimes, ChicagoTrib).

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/64122

Comments

1

Crap like this is why such a large amount of Americans have a problem trusting medicine.

Posted by: apy | February 14, 2008 4:16 PM

2

Each substance that enters the body is processed by the liver and any drug is considered "foreign" and has side effects. The therapeutic effects of the drug should then be much greater than the side effects.

Posted by: jenaisle | February 17, 2008 12:24 AM

3

Every bit of distrust in medicine is earned, IMO. Sure, I use conventional medical care, but I rarely act on the proposed treatment until I verify and learn more, understand it myself, and actually believe that the doc is right. My big fear is something urgent suddenly happening, and not having the time (or presence of mind?) to do some research or at least get a second opinion. But the majority of healthcare is for non-urgent things.

In fact, perhaps more people should distrust medicine, or at least be skeptical, more informed, and asking questions. But it seems most people think their own docs are great; it's the other poor saps who get lousy care. Ya think?

Posted by: Anna | February 24, 2008 4:30 PM

4

Hey just stopping by to get my dose of green info. Always good stuff here! Love it. I know I have mentioned this site before but I think they are pretty cutting edge so I wanted to share this page: http://www.earthlab.com/articles/EarthsVitalSigns.aspx.

I was hoping that someone could drop me a link of other reports that might tell us about how much time is left before we can’t fix global warming? EarthLab.com has a pretty could article here but I want some other opinions. Man just think how the bad will be if we don’t prevent this. EarthLab has quite a few tips on how to lower your impact, here is a spot where they list what their readers recommend: http://www.earthlab.com/life/tips.aspx.

Thanks a lot for all your info and drop me a link if you guys see anything on these subjects.

Posted by: Adrian | February 29, 2008 7:27 PM

5

Yes this being news is stupid. But it's never stupid to replicate a study. Especially when the only studies of a drug are done by the people selling the drug.

Posted by: tom | March 8, 2008 9:54 AM

6

Gee I think there are a bunch of idiots giving other idiots money to study what is already known to be harmful.

Would be nice if money were put into a study that would actually be beneficial.

Hey like, maybe if the money was used to supply food banks with produce, and whole grains and beans, it might actually effect the rate at which heart disease is killing poor people. Maybe many other disease too, ya think?

Hey a study like that might actually convince folks who have a choice, to eat better!

Posted by: Carrie Tucker | October 17, 2008 3:55 PM

7

thanks..

Posted by: muhabbet | March 26, 2009 10:07 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM