Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Profile

AngryToxicologist is a scientist in the public health sector, knows plenty about toxicology, and is occasionally angry about it all. Drop me a line at tox@angrytoxicologist.com.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Useless and Random

Any money I would have gotten from writing this blog is donated to the National Capital Poison Control Center. They rely on grants, save lives, and decrease health care costs. So read this blog every day!

What I'm reading, watching, and rating:

SawMichael Clayton*** out of 5

ReadMiddlesex**** out of 5

SawThe Lives of Others***** out of 5. Best movie I've seen in a long time.

« Is this Animal Testing progress? I think so. | Main | Part of this nutritious nano-breakfast »

FEMA Formaldehyde: the good, the bad, the ugly

Category: Media
Posted on: July 3, 2008 9:18 AM, by angrytoxicologist

The Good

Analysts from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that the FEMA trailers had too much formaldehyde (well, yeah) but also that it was due to cheap materials, sloppy design, and drumroll please, lax or non-existing government standards. It's rare for a gov't report to directly say the standards need to be tighter.

The Bad

This is a terrible news story. Why? Just last week, the EPA said they wouldn't lower the formaldehyde standard to the CA level, but they did say that they would do some new exposure and risk assessments; a good sign of progress. This fact isn't mentioned at all, but isn't this lack of a good standard exactly the reason why we're in the problem to begin with? Yes, I believe it is.

The Ugly

As before the CDC solves the problem by suggesting that residents "make relocating to permanent housing a priority" and if they can't do that, "open windows to let fresh air in". Thanks FEMA, this is the type of compassion and forward thinking problem solving that we've come to expect from y'all.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Medicine & Health

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/75521

Comments

1

well they should do something about formaldehyde, their fumes are toxic.

Posted by: Kayleene | July 5, 2008 3:23 AM

2

Glad that I didn't have to live in a FEMA trailer. I am allergic to formaldehyde!

Posted by: Mamasmad | July 14, 2008 10:20 PM

3

Pretty much the exact same thing has happened in Australia where the Federal government has launched a (somewhat controversial) intervention to tackle social problems in indegenous communities. The converted sea containers imported from China being used to house government employees are positively riddled with not just formaldehyde but a vast array of volatile organics.

Posted by: ardee | July 17, 2008 1:41 AM

4

Thanks

Posted by: mirc indir | March 23, 2009 3:14 PM

5

thanks..

Posted by: muhabbet | March 26, 2009 9:44 AM

6

Pretty much the exact same thing has happened in Australia where the Federal government has launched a (somewhat controversial) intervention to tackle social problems in indegenous communities. The converted sea containers imported from China being used to house government employees are positively riddled with not just formaldehyde but a vast array of volatile organics.

Posted by: dvd film izle | June 9, 2009 1:52 PM

7

The converted sea containers imported from China being used to house government employees are positively riddled with not just formaldehyde but a vast array of volatile organics.

Posted by: Abercrombie | November 30, 2009 9:58 PM

8

FEMA formaldehyde its good to know about its different accepts,that how it can be good,bad and ugly.

Posted by: Reverse Phone Lookup | December 28, 2009 12:41 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.