Now on ScienceBlogs: The Australian's War on Science 41

Seed Media Group

Profile

AngryToxicologist is a scientist in the public health sector, knows plenty about toxicology, and is occasionally angry about it all. Drop me a line at tox@angrytoxicologist.com.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Useless and Random

Any money I would have gotten from writing this blog is donated to the National Capital Poison Control Center. They rely on grants, save lives, and decrease health care costs. So read this blog every day!

What I'm reading, watching, and rating:

SawMichael Clayton*** out of 5

ReadMiddlesex**** out of 5

SawThe Lives of Others***** out of 5. Best movie I've seen in a long time.

« Does ezetimibe (Zetia, and in Vytorin) cause cancer? and who cares? | Main | NAS says the EPA needs to overhaul risk assessment. Duh, but easier said... »

Plastics make you fat too? Angrytoxicologist reboots.

Category: Toxics
Posted on: December 3, 2008 9:41 AM, by angrytoxicologist

Well, if MacGuire was talking about getting into toxicology research on plastics, he was right on. EHP has published a study showing that the additive BPA can cause cells to suppress adiponectin. That would cause insensitivity to insulin and may be behind "metabolic syndrome". Let's pause for a moment and think about that name. That's got to be the worst name for a syndrome ever. It could only be more vague by being called 'syndrome'. I prefer something that creates a nice visual, like bronchiolitis obliterans. Nothing like an obliterated lung to get your attention. I propose cardiolipoinsulinobesity disease. Hmmm...okay, we'll stick with metabolic syndrome...or the slightly more technical, "F'ed up". Seriously, it's also called insulin resistance syndrome. It's symptoms include obesity, heart disease, diabetes, general inflammation, prothrombic state (meaning you're more likely to stroke out). Sweet.

It's not clear how the BPA does this, though it's likely due to it's ability to disrupt hormones. In the study, estradiol (the potent estrogen) had the same effects on breast and abdominal fat tissue. They used human fat tissues that were removed from patients undergoing other procedures. The one issue I have here is that it may be that those undergoing the procedures have cells that react differently than the rest of the population. The samples came from patients getting breast reduction sugery, a tummy tuck, or gastric bypass. The people may have bodies that like to build up fat anyway, especially in the last two. Even if this is true, however, it at least means that some people are effected by BPA; in fact, it may be those who can least afford it.

There was a wide variety of effect of BPA (i.e. some patient's tissues were sensitive to it and others weren't). However, on average, BPA was more potent than estradiol at equimolar doses (that's an equivalent dose based on the number of molecules, not weight, for those of you who didn't take or don't remember chemistry). Yikes!

Anyway, here's the kicker. The levels were environmentally relevant. 1-10 nM are common in people (some up to 20 nM). The study found effects at 0.1 and 1.0 nM. Good 'ole plastics. Is there anything they can't do?


PS Here's my water bottle advice.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/87041

Comments

1

Nice to see you back. :-)

Posted by: Anna | December 3, 2008 11:26 AM

2

Welcome back.

I was worried this place had died.

Posted by: NM | December 4, 2008 4:35 PM

3

As soon as I traded in the plastic water bottles for stainless steel bottles, I read about potential nickel issues with stainless steel in water bottles, s/s cookware. Know anything about that?

I'm not going to make any changes in my s/s usage yet, but I am keeping my ear to the rail to learn more about if nickel is a significant issue to consider or not. But if it's like plastics, it will be another 20+ years at least before we'll know, right?

I'm not bothering with the new BPA-free plastics because who knows what the risks are of the new formulas.

I've also traded out a lot of my plastic food storageware for tempered glass containers with silicon sealed leakproof plastic snap-top lids (I figure there's generally less contact with the lid (greenlock by snapware is the brand). I really like these because they are rectangular, stack well, and make better use of angular cabinet and fridge space than round containers, are really clear and display the contents better ( the males in my household who suffer from "refrigerator blindness" are better at finding items now, sometimes even in the second row back), and are nice for serving at the table. I don't reheat in the microwave much anymore, but microwaving can be done with these. But they are not approved for regular oven/range or toaster oven use.

The only downside I've experienced is storing the empties - the small rectangular size nests into the medium size, but the medium doesn't nest into the large (you'd think they could have managed a very slight dimension difference to accommodate that). So I nest the empty smalls in both of the empty larger sizes and stack them in a cupboard (though most of the time they are in use holding food). So far no breaks or chips, even with a clumsy 4th grader in the house and hard countertops. And I found them at both a big box houseware/kitchenware store (with 20% coupons but slightly higher regular prices) and at one of the local grocery stores near the food wrap section.

Posted by: Anna | December 8, 2008 12:43 PM

4

welcome back.

so riddle me this; if BPA is potent on an equimolar basis with estrogen, surely you must accept that it cannot be acting through the estrogen receptors ?

per

Posted by: per | December 21, 2008 7:27 PM

5

penis büyütücüler

Posted by: penis büyütücüler | December 31, 2008 4:09 AM

6

thanks you yess :)

Posted by: çet | January 1, 2009 1:30 PM

7

super sohbet etme yeri thankss

Posted by: sohbet | January 1, 2009 1:38 PM

8

thankss.

Posted by: chat | January 1, 2009 2:51 PM

9

güncel spor haberlerini barındıran sitedir..thankss.

Posted by: spor haberleri | January 1, 2009 5:42 PM

10

Thankss.Best regards..

Posted by: sohbet | January 1, 2009 5:57 PM

11

very nice blog Thanks

Posted by: Sohbet | March 16, 2009 1:48 PM

12

Thank you very much for this information.


Posted by: sohbet | March 16, 2009 7:41 PM

13

Thx.

Posted by: muhabbet | March 18, 2009 10:47 PM

14

The only downside I've experienced is storing the empties - the small rectangular size nests into the medium size, but the medium doesn't nest into the large (you'd think they could have managed a very slight dimension difference to accommodate that).

Posted by: burun estetigi | April 25, 2009 12:07 PM

15

Thank you very much for this information...

Posted by: konteyner | May 18, 2009 11:32 AM

16


Writes is very good thanks do you deserve to share:)

Posted by: kabin | May 19, 2009 5:08 AM

17

I want to congratulate would follow ongoing blog, su deposu and really are very successful, thank you.

Posted by: su deposu | May 19, 2009 5:10 AM

18

thank you.

Posted by: muhabbet | May 26, 2009 11:38 AM

19

Thank you very much for this information.

http://www.islamodasi.net

Posted by: paylasonline | June 5, 2009 7:17 AM

20

very nice blog Thanks

Posted by: islamisohbet | June 6, 2009 3:59 AM

21

thank you very much

Posted by: sohbet | July 4, 2009 5:21 PM

22

ThankS.

Posted by: yonja | July 4, 2009 5:24 PM

23

It's interesting... but is that true?

Posted by: accommodation wroclaw | July 9, 2009 11:23 AM

24

The only söve downside I've experienced söve is storing the empties - the small rectangular söve size nests into the medium size, söve but the medium doesn't nest söve into the large (you'd think they could söve have managed a very slight söve dimension difference to accommodate that).

Posted by: söve | July 11, 2009 5:00 AM

25

Here's my question: isn't any company free to charge any prices for its products, unless it's a monopoly. Do the Big Four have a monopoly on music? If not, is charging Web stations and not charging terresrtial stations illegal? BTW, is it really true that terrestial stations pay nothing? That's hard to believe.

Posted by: sohbet | July 20, 2009 7:19 AM

26

doesn't nest söve into the large (you'd think they could söve have managed a very slight söve dimension difference to accommodate that).

al? BTW, is it really true that terrestial stations pay nothing?

Posted by: sohbet | July 20, 2009 7:23 AM

27

doesn't nest söve into the large (you'd think they could söve have managed a very slight söve dimension difference to accommodate that).

al? BTW, is it really true that terrestial stations pay nothing?...

Posted by: sohbet odaları | August 20, 2009 7:58 PM

28

Very cool app. Can you tell me where to download the Help files? Apparently they didn’t make it during the install process, so it won’t load them. Thanks!


Posted by: chat | August 24, 2009 4:24 AM

29

Thanks

Posted by: Forum | September 15, 2009 7:07 PM

30

I am thanking for the knowledge

Posted by: kangallar | September 20, 2009 7:07 PM

31

Thankjs..

Posted by: emlak | September 30, 2009 6:40 AM

32

Really very interesting post.I was not knowing that plastic can also make us fat.

Posted by: anti cellulite cream | October 31, 2009 1:58 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM