Now on ScienceBlogs: Dr. Rolando Arafiles: Antivaccine rhetoric, colloidal silver for the flu, and Morgellons disease

Enter to Win

Profile

I am a professor of statistics and political science at Columbia University and author of Bayesian Data Analysis (with John Carlin, Hal Stern, and Donald Rubin), Teaching Statistics: A Bag of Tricks (with Deborah Nolan), Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (with Jennifer Hill), and, most recently, Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do (with David Park, Boris Shor, Joe Bafumi, and Jeronimo Cortina).

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

« Why most discovered true associations are inflated: Type M errors are all over the place | Main | Does the Senate Finance Committee version of the health-care bill threaten to cripple evidence-based medicine? »

Everybody's a critic

Posted on: November 22, 2009 11:49 AM, by Andrew Gelman

Christopher Nelson writes:

Check out the GDP chart under "The New Triad" here:

GDPR6.gif

It's supposed to compare GDP in China, India, and the US for three time periods but for my money, it's composed wrong. The bars should be for the years, not the countries. That way we could see total GDP in each year and how it was composed of the respective GDPs. It would even be fairly easy to scan across and see how the country's GDP grew or shrank. What's there is just confusing.

I agree. Better to put time on the x-axis if possible. Then you don't need a bar plot at all, you can use a line plot, which I generally prefer.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/125257

Comments

1

Is that a stacked bar chart? Or do all the bars start at zero and the smaller bars obscure the bottoms of the larger bars? I couldn't tell from the article.

Posted by: Jon Peltier | November 22, 2009 1:30 PM

2

Those must all start at zero, I would assume GDP would increase over time, not decrease and then rebound. What a confusingly constructed graph!

Posted by: DR | November 22, 2009 2:05 PM

3

I think the best choice here would be three bars next to each other for each country, not grouped by year. That way, you can see the growth over time for each country, and compare across countries as well.

I also disagree about using lines here, since these are individual, distinct projections (not measured values). There is no data in between the years, so distinct bars are a better representation.

But yeah, terrible chart. The numbers are quite interesting though, and also the GDP/capita chart in the linked article.

Posted by: Robert Kosara | November 22, 2009 3:05 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.