Bill O'Reilly identifies reasons to vote for John Edwards.

(He didn't do it on purpose, of course.)

According to Bill-O, the world would be a scary, scary, scary place if Edwards is elected president:

Remember, no coerced interrogation, civilian lawyers in courts for captured overseas terrorists, no branding the Iranian guards terrorists, and no phone surveillance without a specific warrant.

That sounds suspiciously like the vision of a world where the President of the United States actually preserves, protects, and defends the Constitution of the United States. And we all know that's the last thing that we can afford, right?

(Hat tips: Shakesville and Glen Greenwald.)

More like this

Before I ever read the STACLU response to yesterday's ruling by Judge Taylor, I could easily predict two things: 1. They would declare her an evil, activist, terrorist-loving liberal demon. 2. They would either misunderstand or misrepresent the ruling. Just call me Nostradamus. Here's John…
One of the most fascinating aspects of the Hamdan case was that it was argued not by a prominent legal scholar or law professor, nor by a private defense attorney, but by a military lawyer from the JAG office, Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift. Think about the position this put him in as an officer, taking a…
I've criticized Democratic Congressman Reyes before, so it's worth noting when he gets something right. Here's a letter Reyes wrote to Little Lord Pontchartrain: Dear Mr. President: The Preamble to our Constitution states that one of our highest duties as public officials is to "provide for the…
Ever since the arrest of a bunch of suspects in the UK and elsewhere in a plot to bomb several airplanes, the White House and their apologists have been united in their talking points: A) that this proves the need for warrantless surveillance and B) that those who oppose warrantless surveillance…

You really gotta love Billo. The last time I heard from him he had a segment on the efficacy of "coerced interrogation" (read: torture) is getting reliable information from detainees. As guests he has Michael "human rights is a flexible concept" Scheuer, architect of the extraordinary rendition program, and George Tenet. Predictably, they both told him that torture was totally effective and necessary for victory in the "War on Terror". I guess in Billo-Land it is somehow hard hitting journalism to take two known advocates of torture at their word on the results of a non-transparent and probably illegal activity.