Seed Media Group

Profile

sidebarphoto.jpg bioephemera is art + biology - anything and everything from representations of science in art and literature to the neuroscience of aesthetics. Along with lots of other stuff that's just plain interesting.

Jessica Palmer is a biologist & artist currently based in Washington, DC. She spent the last few years teaching at a small state college out West, and now plays with science policy. Her homepage includes the bioephemera archives & a gallery of her work.

Note: the contents of this blog are the personal opinions of the author, completely independent of any organizations with which she is affiliated.

Search this blog

Recent Posts

Categories

Recent Comments

bioephemeral sampler

Archives

Blogroll

Shiny Objects

00ootssoeraaapsmall.jpg
thinkingbloggerpf8.jpg
intellectual-blogger-award-small-thumb.jpg
excellentblog.jpg
My Amazon.com Wish List

Recently Read

« Taxa: Stunning Losses | Main | Science in the Cinema »

Can you calculate your risk of lung cancer?

Category: Biology
Posted on: July 8, 2008 1:25 PM, by Jessica Palmer

Sloan-Kettering's online lung cancer risk calculator tells smokers what their relative risk of cancer would be if they quit.

I'm all in favor of getting people to quit smoking, but this kind of risk can really only be calculated for groups, not individuals. Will people using the calculator understand that?

Sloan-Kettering recommends the tool for "people who meet all of these conditions: Age: 50 to 75 years old; Smoking History: 10 to 60 cigarettes a day for 25 to 55 years; Current Status: Current smokers, and former smokers who quit 20 years ago or less." My mom is one of those people, but I'm not sure how she'd be impacted by a "prognostic nomogram" that told her if she quit, she has a 1% chance of lung cancer, and if she did not, she has a 2% chance. Would she feel that the 1% risk even if she quits means it's too late to bother? Would she feel that both 1% and 2% were negligibly small risks? Would the phrasing "quitting cuts your risk of lung cancer in half" change how she feels about the numbers 1% and 2%?

As it happens, my mom recently did quit, which is why these are all hypothetical questions. The driving force behind her decision wasn't fear of future cancer; it was other respiratory problems caused by smoking, which restricted her breathing and had an immediate impact on her life. I'm not sure whether this calculator would have had much effect on her choice, and in general, I'm not sure giving people personalized risk calculations like this is the best thing to do. It's hard to understand what risk means for an individual. What do you think?

Comments

Thanks for the information on cancer, Jessica. That is very interesting. I agree that they should really pay attention to the idividual.

We recently wrote an article on cancer at Brain Blogger. Could it be possible to cure cancer of any type, at any stage? According to recent studies by research centers all across America, it might be

We would like to read your comments on our article. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Kelly

Posted by: Kelly | July 8, 2008 4:17 PM

Anyone who knows a smoker should get them to try this risk calculator. Maybe it will make a difference in whether they continue on damaging their health by smoking.

Posted by: Pete | July 8, 2008 6:34 PM

Pete: You fail to understand the psychology of addiction. A rational assessment of the risks has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Posted by: Dunc | July 9, 2008 6:16 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs