In case you didn't see it, the latest xkcd is a visual shout-out to data visualization guru Edward Tufte's favorite map, this 1861 depiction of Napoleon's march on Moscow, by Charles Joseph Minard. Yay!


Now on ScienceBlogs: Map that Campus L
biology + art
bioephemera is art + biology - everything from representations of science in art and literature to the neuroscience of aesthetics.
read the first BioE post
visit the old BioE archive
Note: the contents of this blog are the personal opinions of the author, independent of any organizations with which she is affiliated, and should not be construed as professional advice.
« Magnetic Movie wins "most accurate" award at ISF | Main | Google's Phantom Town »
Category: Artists & Art • Design • Ephemera
Posted on: November 5, 2009 9:51 PM, by Jessica Palmer
In case you didn't see it, the latest xkcd is a visual shout-out to data visualization guru Edward Tufte's favorite map, this 1861 depiction of Napoleon's march on Moscow, by Charles Joseph Minard. Yay!


Find more posts in:
Information Science
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124151
Comments
I have actually mapped stories out that way, for no reason other that my own warped entertainment. Discovering the Minard diagram was like a revelation.
Posted by: John McKay | November 5, 2009 11:54 PM
I hadn't seen the Minard map before. It's a stunning depiction of the troop losses.
Posted by: John | November 6, 2009 12:24 AM
aha! I knew when I saw the xkcd comic that it reminded me of something. The LOTR diagram is truly awesome in its detail and obsessivitude. But the Tufte connection makes the whole thing even cooler.
Posted by: ecologist | November 6, 2009 3:18 AM
No, it's the film of the Lord of the Rings. Nothing to do with Tolkien at all. You can tell by the elves at Helms Deep.
Posted by: csrster | November 6, 2009 7:37 AM
There doesn't seem to be a version that's magnifiable to the point of being readable, which is a pity.
The "Primer" joke is lost on me, as I'm not familiar with it.
I think I've sometimes wished for a diagram like this when reading particularly complex novels (not so much for movies), but it's easy to think of situations that would be difficult to handle (so character A, in between doing X and Y, is later revealed to have impersonated character B, who in retaliation steals the time machine that we saw in the flashback, and so forth).
I don't expect to see such diagram as standard appendices any time soon, not even in e-books.
Posted by: Adrian Morgan | November 6, 2009 8:51 AM
@5
Click the link 'Movie Narrative Charts' bioephemera provided, then click on the graphic once you're there. Very big image. Very obsessive with detail, too :-)
(bioephemera: If you don't know it already, you're on my blogroll!)
Posted by: Grant | November 6, 2009 9:30 PM
Thanks, Grant, for the clarification (and the compliment) :)
Posted by: Jessica Palmer
| November 6, 2009 11:03 PM
nerd-o-licious as always. This filled me with geeky glee.
Posted by: Esmeralda M Rupp-Spangle | November 9, 2009 3:27 PM
On a tangentially related note, I recommend artist Ward Shelley's schematic paintings.
http://hungryhyaena.blogspot.com/2009/05/ward-shelley-at-pierogi.html
http://www.wardshelley.com/
Posted by: Hungry Hyaena | November 21, 2009 7:53 PM