Now on ScienceBlogs: The Ultimate Charles Darwin Coffee-Table Book

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

About

Welcome to The ScienceBlogs Book Club, Seed's virtual venue for hosting discussions on stimulating new titles in science, featuring reviews from across the ScienceBlogs network.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Featured

In October, 2008:

falseprophets_small.png

Autism's False Prophets: Bad Science, Risky Medicine, and the Search for a Cure, by Paul Offit

Buy a copy at Amazon.

 

In June, 2008:

microcosm.jpg

Microcosm: E. Coli and the New Science of Life, by Carl Zimmer

Buy a copy at Amazon.

« Where's the Line? | Main | The Risk of Nature, The Nature of Risk »

Horizontal Gene Transfer

Posted on: June 12, 2008 10:17 AM, by John Dennehy

Back in the 1970s, a scientist named Ananda Chakrabarty received the first patent for a genetically modified lifeform, an oil eating "Superbug" from the bacterial strain Pseudomonas putida. The feat was doubly hailed as a major step in bioremediation and a travesty of nature. In the long run, Chakrabarty's Superbug was a failure. It was unable to survive in the wild, unable to compete with native bacteria, and unable to move towards food sources.

john_dennehy.jpg

The moral of the story is that it is very difficult to tinker with nature and produce an organism that can survive outside the rarefied confines of the laboratory. It takes a certain amount of hubris to believe that we can outdo 4 billion years of natural selection.

Genetic engineering? Nature does it all the time. Scientists call it horizontal gene transfer.

conjugation.jpg

Bacteria can share antibiotic resistance genes. Viruses often encode virulence factors that make bacteria make you sick. Among eukaryotes, examples of horizontal gene transfer are popping up every day among organisms as diverse as plants, nematodes, beetles, and yeast. Even human--gasp--may be riddled with the remnants of horizontal gene transfers: transposons, "jumping genes", retroviruses, B chromosomes, even our organelles.

Engineering life is as old as life itself. We may be the first to do so in a conscious directed manner, but let's not kid ourselves into thinking we are the first. There is no doubt there will be mistakes made along the way, but fears of Frankenstein fauna overwhelming nature are vastly overstated. Genetic engineering has already overwhelmingly benefited our lives in ways that most of us are unaware of. Simply put, the benefits have outweighed the costs by several orders of magnitude.

Chakrabarty, A M; Mylroie, J R; Friello, D A & Vacca, J G (1975), "Transformation of Pseudomonas putida and Escherichia coli with plasmid-linked drug-resistance factor DNA.", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72 (9): 3647-51, 1975 Sep, PMID:1103151

Share on: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/73918

Comments

1

A major problem with oil-eating bacteria is that oil is not a complete diet. To use them to clean up an oil spill means providing nitrogen, phosphorus, etc.; whatever is lacking in the oil. Probably do more harm to the ecosystem than the oil spill did.

Posted by: Jim Thomerson | June 12, 2008 11:42 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM