For more video book reviews by Joanne Manaster, check out her YouTube page.
About
Welcome to The ScienceBlogs Book Club, Seed's virtual venue for hosting discussions on stimulating new titles in science, featuring reviews from across the ScienceBlogs network.
Search
Recent Posts
- Mark Pendergrast wraps up the Inside the Outbreaks Book Club
- ENVY OF PUMP HANDLE REMOVERS AND EVENTUAL GRATIFICATION
- Is Bioterrorism the Most Terrifying Public Health Problem?
- A Few Questions and Answers on Reye's Sydrome
- Congress, Federal Agencies, and Public Health
- The Power of Comparison
- How Do You Value What Didn't Happen?
- Solving Puzzles vs. Solving Problems
- Number-Crunching at the EIS and Why Public Health is Politics
- Reading Between the Lines
Recent Comments
- Julie on The End of My Addiction, by Olivier Ameisen: Could Baclofen Be the Cure We're Looking For?
- Sesli Chat on ENVY OF PUMP HANDLE REMOVERS AND EVENTUAL GRATIFICATION
- afrika mangosu on Number-Crunching at the EIS and Why Public Health is Politics
- Cung Mua on Number-Crunching at the EIS and Why Public Health is Politics
- recepti za torte on Number-Crunching at the EIS and Why Public Health is Politics
- sara maria on Mark Pendergrast wraps up the Inside the Outbreaks Book Club
- lost and found on Number-Crunching at the EIS and Why Public Health is Politics
- RevitaDerm Review on Number-Crunching at the EIS and Why Public Health is Politics
- milton brown on The End of My Addiction, by Olivier Ameisen: Could Baclofen Be the Cure We're Looking For?
- filmy on author's initial entry, AUTISM'S FALSE PROPHETS
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- October 2008
- September 2008
- June 2008
Blogroll
- ScienceBlogs
- Amazon
- Google Book Search
- Goodreads
- Powell's Books Review-a-Day
- Books: NPR
- TLS Science Book Review
- The New York Times Book Review
- Note:Books
- Shelfari
- Bookslut
- LibraryThing
- Bookgasm
- Book Bench (The New Yorker)
- The Science Book Challenge 2009
Featured
In June, 2010:
Inside the Outbreaks: The Elite Medical Detectives of the Epidemic Intelligence Service, by Mark Pendergrast
Buy a copy at Amazon.
In October, 2008:
Autism's False Prophets: Bad Science, Risky Medicine, and the Search for a Cure, by Paul Offit
Buy a copy at Amazon.
In June, 2008:
Microcosm: E. Coli and the New Science of Life, by Carl Zimmer
Buy a copy at Amazon.
« Video Book Review: Mad Science by Theo Gray | Main | Stephen Jay Gould and the Politics of Evolution »
Video Book Review: Doubt is Their Product by David Michaels
Category: Book Review • Video
Posted on: May 14, 2009 5:32 PM, by Erin Johnson
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/110049
Comments
Thanks for bringing this book to our attention. Good review!
Posted by: Steve Levin | May 19, 2009 4:29 PM
Implying that only those with a PhD are qualified to identify shoddy scholarship is pure condescension. You made your case for that conclusion and anyone is free to argue with it.
I'd be curious to know the relationship between the museum and the history channel.
I'd also be willing to bet this didn't make it in Science and/or Nature. That said, the paper could have gotten through review there as well, as the process is just an effort at quality assurance, not a guarantee of said quality.
Posted by: sevişme | May 21, 2009 4:51 AM
Credit is a competitive industry, if you don't like the rate on offer from one lender then go somewhere else, if no one will lend to you at a decent rate maybe you shouldn't be borrowing. If the consumer is price sensitive then the price will fall. All that legislating maximum rates does is either restrict the availability of legal credit or induces the lender to increase other charges and fees (price controls restrict availability of the good subject to price controls).
Posted by: seksi | May 21, 2009 4:53 AM
Counseling? Friends? A little healthy introspection? There are a lot of better options than religion!
Posted by: sex siteleri | May 21, 2009 5:30 PM
I'd be curious to know the relationship between the museum and the history channel.
I'd also be willing to bet this didn't make it in Science and/or Nature. That said, the paper could have gotten through review there as well, as the process is just an effort at quality assurance, not a guarantee of said quality.
Posted by: sevgi sözü | May 22, 2009 5:17 AM
When doctors opened the skull of a 3-day old from Colorado Springs to remove what they thought was a brain tumor, they were surprised to find a collection of organized body parts—including two small feet, a partial hand and intestines. "This was the most well-organized 'tumor' I've ever heard of," said ScienceBlogger PZ Myers
Posted by: resimleri | May 22, 2009 5:19 AM
I believe the main reason why apple is locking its systems (both macosx and iphone) is software consistency and side effects.
The basic idea is that if you give away too much control over the core of your system, then you end-up with myriads of unsecure applications. If you need examples - see how windows looks like these days.
Instead, apple was always allowing only limited integration with its systems. Of course - you can still write some applications for mac, and communicate with the system core through provided API, but you don't have possibility to really change the core itself. Thats why Apple used to be so much more stable than windows.
In case of iphone its the same case - they just don't want every kid on the block to write sh*#ty apps, they want to have control over what people are writing and how secure it is - in order to be able to say: yes, its stable, we guarantee that.
There's no evil in this, its just customer service. Just like when you go to the restaurant you want someone (chef) to have control over what all the cooks are cooking.
Posted by: Prefabrik | August 7, 2009 7:58 AM
I'd be curious to know the relationship between the museum and the history channel.
I'd also be willing to bet this didn't make it in Science and/or Nature. That said, the paper could have gotten through review there as well, as the process is just an effort at quality assurance, not a guarantee of said quality.
Posted by: orjin krem | February 3, 2011 9:43 AM