Mechanics of Heat

One of the last things we cover in Physics 201 is heat. You all know what heat is: the atoms in a substance jiggle around or fly around freely if the substance happens to be a gas. Like all moving massive objects, these atoms have a certain kinetic energy. Now the problem is that they’re all constantly moving and crashing into each other, exchanging energy back and forth. It’s hard enough to keep track of the energy exchange between two colliding objects (trust me!), much less a trillion trillion of them. So we treat them as a statistical ensemble and just look at the average energy. Modulo a few technical considerations, that average energy is just the temperature.

We know how to work with energy for macroscopic objects like baseballs in their trajectories and wheels rolling along the ground, but how can we convert those macroscopic and microscopic average energies into each other? We do it with a quantity called the heat capacity, which tells you how much energy it takes to change the temperature of a substance. It works like this:

Here Q is the amount of heat added – or equivalently the work done – m is the mass of the heated substance, c is its heat capacity, and delta T is the change in temperature. All units SI, of course. Here’s a quick quiz I gave my students last week:

A paddle wheel stirs a water tank at 50 RPM for one hour. The torque transmitted by the shaft is 20 N*m. The water in the tank has mass 10 kg and is initially at 20 degrees C. No heat is lost to the surroundings. What is the final temperature of the water, if its heat capacity is c = 4184 J/(kg*K) ?

Well, we have to find Q first, and then we can use the above equation to find the change in temperature. Q is the work done by the paddle, and work done by a torque is just torque times the angle it rotated through. That angle is 2 π times the number of revolutions, which is itself just 50 RPM * 60 minutes. In total, I get that the work is 376,992 J.

Now we’re looking for delta T, so divide that by the mass times the heat capacity. With the givens, I find a delta T of 9.01 degrees for a final temperature of 29.1 degrees.

Not a huge increase given the pretty hefty amount of energy transferred. But really this isn’t a shock. Catch a baseball thrown at you with high energy and it doesn’t turn red hot when you bring it to a stop. It takes a lot of energy to make temperature increase that’s noticeable at the human scale. But it can be done, from “burning rubber” when accelerating or braking a car to making fire with the friction of a stick.

1. #1 NoAstronomer
November 20, 2008

I hope that quote isn’t the complete set of instructions you gave to your students, since it’s missing a key piece of information.

2. #2 Matt
November 20, 2008

No indeed, here I forgot to say how long the paddle was spinning. One hour is what was on the printed quiz.

3. #3 steve
November 20, 2008

This is weird 2 days in a row you have written a blog on what we have studied in chemistry class (its taught by a physicist right now though) Today is the lab for it.

4. #4 Blind Squirrel FCD
November 20, 2008

Another macro scale example is the heat increase in a nail after a few good smites with a hammer on an anvil. You can actually burn yourself. I noticed the heat equivalent of work as a young child.

5. #5 CCPhysicist
November 20, 2008

Hmmmm.
You all know what heat is: the atoms in a substance jiggle around or fly around freely if the substance happens to be a gas.

No, that is internal (or thermal) energy. Heat is the movement of thermal energy from one body to another. The expression on the right side of your equation describes the way the change in internal energy (supplied by Q) manifests itself in a change in temperature. That is why you can derive an approximate expression for the c of a solid based on a model of its internal energy.

Maybe you haven’t gotten to the chapter where the specific heat for an ideal gas (at constant volume) is determined directly from the internal energy formula derived from the principles of statistical mechanics. (Constant pressure is different because in that case some of the “heat” goes into work rather than internal energy, a case that does not occur for solids or liquids.)

I think I was prompted to write the following blog
http://doctorpion.blogspot.com/2008/04/freshman-curriculum-thermodynamics.html
when Chad wrote something about reforming the freshman curriculum vis-a-vis quantum mechanics. We still start the coverage of thermo as if there was still a caloric fluid out there. Oddly, an intro chemistry book used at our CC approaches thermo in a very modern (stat mech) fashion. The chemists hate it, with good reason: their students don’t know any physics yet!

6. #6 Ronald
November 21, 2008

My comment: S= k*ln*W

Never get tired talking about heat.

New comments have been disabled.