Built on Facts

Pi day!

Whew! Busy week for me, hence the missing post or two. Traditionally Saturdays on this blog tend to be non-physics fare – either links, commentary on something nonscientific, or whatever. Today I think it will be the celebration of Pi Day!

Pi Day: As you know from the SB main page, today is pi day. 3/14, representing the famous number 3.14159265359…

You first meet is as the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. As you go on in math, you meet it pretty much everywhere else too. Seriously everywhere.

There’s also a Pi Approximation Day, on 7/22. Which of course only makes sense if you write your dates in the 22/7 format. 22/7 is approximately pi, because 22/7 = 3.14286…

Let’s look a little more closely at that concept. To approximate a number as a fraction, we’re saying there are two numbers a and b such that a/b is close to our number. You would start with a low number for b and work your way up with the desired approximation. Why don’t we start with b = 1? In that case, clearly 3/1 = 3 is our best approximation.

Now it turns out that as we try higher values of b, we won’t be able to find a closer approximation to pi until we hit b = 7. Then we’ll find that a = 22, leading to the famous 22/7 approximation. But we can take b higher: can we (say) find some number a such that a/13 or is a better approximation? Nope. b = 13 (which I picked as an example for no particular reason) won’t do it. In fact 22/7 is a very good approximation. There’s no a that will give a better approximation for any b until we reach b = 106.

With a little effort, we find that the next rational approximation to pi that’s better than 22/7 is 333/106. And further it will turn out that the next approximation to improve upon that doesn’t have to make its own b much higher: 355/113.

So what are all these approximations buying us compared to the actual value of pi? Let’s see:

Approximation: 3/1 = 3
Percent Error: 4.5

Approximation: 22/7 = 3.14286…
Percent Error: 0.04

Approximation: 333/106 = 3.14151…
Percent Error: 0.0026

Approximation: 355/113 = 3.1415929…
Percent Error: 0.0000085

And just for kicks, the next one after that:

Approximation: 103993/33102 = 3.14159265301…
Percent Error: 0.000000018

Going that high kind of defeats the entire point of a rational approximation, which is to make the math easier. And it’s worth pointing out that in some sense 22/7 and 355/113 are especially good approximations because you have to make a quite sizable jump in b before you can find a better approximation. If you’d like to take a look at the machinery of this calculation, check out the theory of continued fractions. It’s a beautiful subject but not one that can really be done justice in a single Pi Day news post.

Enjoy, and go eat a pie!

Comments

  1. #1 Uncle Al
    March 14, 2009

    Baby Boomer early retirement will implode Social Security and Medicare tightly near 2015. 3/14/15 would be good; a year later would be satisfactory.

    Some repeating sequences in pi (places after the decimal). Interested readers are invited to find the other five.

    777777777777 from 368,299,898,266-th
    999999999999 from 897,831,316,556-th
    111111111111 from 1,041,032,609,981-th
    888888888888 from 1,141,385,905,180-th
    666666666666 from 1,221,587,715,177-th

  2. #2 Carl Brannen
    March 14, 2009

    In addition to continued fractions, one of my chess buddies recently pointed out continued square roots. For example,
    let f(a) = x = sqrt( a + sqrt( a + sqrt( a + …) ) )

    then x^2 = a + x, and one has that x^2 – x – a = 0 and so
    f(a) = (1 + – sqrt( 1 + 4a ) ) / 2.

    Therefore, one may have
    1 = sqrt( 0 + sqrt( 0 + sqrt( 0 + …) ) )

  3. #3 Kobra
    March 14, 2009

    Happy pi day!

  4. #4 DaleP
    March 15, 2009

    Uncle Al said:
    Baby Boomer early retirement will implode Social Security and Medicare tightly near 2015.

    No implosion will happen within the 75 year planning horizon. A minor reduction in benefits might happen in 40 years. Please make true statements.

  5. #5 Uncle Al
    March 15, 2009

    70 million Baby Boomers entitled to average benefits $1300/mo plus average $400/mo Medicare expenses = $1.4 trillion/year sudden outflow with their previously SS taxed income contributions reduced to zero. There is no Social Security fund backup – it was 100% embezzled as T-bills (backed by the Social Security fund). Incoming is outgoing, except there will be no incoming for quadrupled outgoing.

    What social strata did 3+ millon incremental firings since November 2008 impact? 50+ aged adults kicked the Hell out of their fat salaries, benefits, pensions, and nest eggs. They are unhirable given massive youth oversubscription to cheap employment. Like an imploding fission warhead, a little Rayleigh-Taylor instability won’t matter at all as shock wave hits dense implosion tamper and that accelerates across free space onto the delta-phase plutonium/0.8 wt-% gallium alloy pit. The implosion front is *already* retired. All that remains is a few shakes of patience while the wavefont chirps.

  6. #6 DaleP
    March 15, 2009

    #5
    Your rant is practically poetry, but is a gross mis-estimate of the future. 70 million will not retire at once. It will be many years before they are all retired. The “Trust Fund” is as it always was, a promise to pay, based on taxing power. You may have the opinion that the Congress may vote not to pay and that the President will sign that bill, but I think it is unlikely. Your political opinion doesn’t make it fact.

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.