Now on ScienceBlogs: Spirited Debate with Ray and Kirk

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Built on Facts

An exploration of physics and the quest to understand our world.

Profile

profile.jpg Matt Springer is a graduate student of physics at Texas A&M university. He is also an occasional writer and tinkerer, and he is probably too curious for his own good.

Search

Feeds/Networks

http://www.wikio.com

Donate

Help Matt not starve! Use this link to amazon.com when you order from Amazon, and a fraction of the purchase price will be sent to me at zero cost to you. Much obliged, and thanks for your patronage.


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Physics/Math Blogs

My Other-Than-Science Reading (variable, very incomplete)

« The Semi-Amazing Spider-Man | Main | Nuclear Power »

The Color of Water

Posted on: September 3, 2009 11:12 AM, by Matt Springer

"Why is the sky blue?"

It's one of those questions that most people don't know the answer to, while others know at least the basic explanation that the atmosphere scatters blue light more strongly than the other visible wavelengths. Ask why that happens and you'll enter the realm of some interesting and somewhat complicated physics. We'll do that later, and do an easier one today.

Kids sometimes also ask why water is blue. The most common answer is that it isn't - the blue of the ocean is attributed to reflected sky or something similar, while the water itself is clear. There's some truth to that, but it's not the whole story. Water really is blue - a very very faint almost transparent blue.

Let's take a look at Wikipedia's plot of the absorption spectrum of water:

water.png

It's a logarithmic plot, so for instance water absorbs more than a billion times more ultraviolet than it does at the bottom of its transmission window. It's no coincidence that visible light happens to be transmitted the best. There would be very little point in having eyes that can see wavelengths that don't make from the sun through the atmospheric water vapor in any reasonable quantity.

But you may notice that although visible light is transmitted very well, blue wavelengths are transmitted better than red ones. After passing through a few dozen meters the difference is enough to be noticeable; much more of the blue light has passed through without being absorbed.

The qualitative reason for the gap is straightforward. The bending and stretching of the bonds between the hydrogen and oxygen typically have energies in the infrared and microwave frequencies, while the electronic energy levels typically have energies in the ultraviolet and higher. In the middle water just doesn't have much internal structure with resonances near those frequencies and so most energy with those frequencies passes straight through.

And that's why water is blue.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/119083

Comments

1

Water absorbance edging into the deep red arises from combination and overtone bands, not from pure vibronic transitions.

There would be very little point in having eyes that can see wavelengths that don't make from the sun through your water-filled eyeballs to your retina. In the bad old days cataract extractions left the patient able to see down to about 350 nm. Blacklight was visible and retinas fried.

Today the opacified natural lens is replaced with a Plexiglas IOL implant. It corrects vision to 20/20 at one distance. It contains a hydroxyphenylbenzotriazole UV-absorber down to 400 nm colorless or ~415 nm pale yellow (e.g., Tinuvin 326) for extra retina protection. Variable focus IOLs are not quite spiffy yet.

Posted by: Uncle Al | September 3, 2009 1:09 PM

2

Nice complementary post here which goes into specific molecular vibrations a bit.

Posted by: Patrick LeClair | September 3, 2009 1:19 PM

3

A related question. Having lived long enough to have gray hair I was faced with the question (from my wife) "Why is your hair black (or at least dark) when its wet?" Hated not having a good answer to that. Its clearly not differential absorption because the distance light has to travel is much less than an e-folding.

Posted by: bobh | September 3, 2009 2:42 PM

4

When my kid asks why the sky is blue, I'm busting out Jackson.

Posted by: dWj | September 3, 2009 3:48 PM

5

I'm interested in your explanation for the sky being blue. You made it sound like you might go into technical details.

Bonus points if you include loop diagrams beyond the one loop level if you are using QED. :)

Posted by: Joseph Smidt | September 3, 2009 11:57 PM

6

Scuba divers know that reds disappear pretty quickly at depth. I actually once bought a wetsuit with red trim, thinking that it would be easy for my buddy to pick out in a crowd of divers. Oooooppps!

Posted by: Julie Stahlhut | September 4, 2009 12:58 AM

7

I read that backreaction post before too (like Patrick #2 said).

I particularly like this tidbit: the vibration frequency of the bonds goes down if you use deuterium in your water instead of hydrogen, and you get colourless water.

Posted by: ColonelFazackerley | September 4, 2009 7:03 AM

8

If you define the atmosphere's color in terms of its tranmission spectrum, the same way you did for water, it is actually red. That the atmosphere is a red filter can be seen during lunar eclipses.

Posted by: Robert | September 4, 2009 3:58 PM

9

The =current= answer to "Why is the Sky Blue?" can be found in Gotz Hoeppe's wonderful book "Why the Sky is Blue; Discovering the Color of Life" translated from the German. It is NOT a trivial question and even the most sophisticated single physics answers that people give are actually only partially true. There is more than one thing going on at a time in the sky.

Posted by: Markk | September 5, 2009 5:27 PM

10

This is good too, if you'd like a physics textbook that has a lengthy discussion of why the sky is blue:

"Fundamentals of Atmospheric Radiation" by Craig F. Bohren and Eugene Clothiaux

Posted by: Robert | September 6, 2009 8:44 PM

11

Heavy water isn't...

Posted by: Lab Lemming | September 7, 2009 3:55 PM

Post a Comment

(Email address is entirely optional, but a consistent email - fake is fine - helps the system identify repeat commenters as not spam.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM