Built on Facts

Radium and Forgeries

This is a painting called The Supper at Emmaus. Its subject is the story in the 24th chapter of Luke’s gospel, and the story of the painting is itself quite a tale.

i-c9db16a5f22d4393e1bf0904fce4a5a0-emmaus.png

It was discovered from obscurity in 1937 by the Dutch painter Hans van Meegeren, and it was acclaimed by experts as a heretofore unknown masterpiece of the legendary 17th century painter Johannes Vermeer. Soon other previous unknown Vermeers began to surface thanks to his efforts. During the occupation by the Nazis, van Meegeren sold some of the paintings to the loathsome Hermann Göring for the equivalent of millions of dollars. After the war, the Dutch were understandably upset about this act of cultural betrayal and van Meegeren was put on trial for his crime. The penalty would have been severe, but van Meegeren dropped a bombshell:

He had not actually sold any Vermeer paintings, he claimed. He had forged all of the paintings, leaving Göring holding a fake rather than an actual cultural treasure. The penalty for such fraud was much less steep, and the authorities were skeptical. Nonetheless, close examination combined with a virtuoso demonstration by van Meegeren demonstrated the truth of the forgery beyond a reasonable doubt. He was convicted of fraud and given a light sentence. Sadly for him, he died of unrelated heart issues just before he began his sentence.

So where’s the physics? Both Vermeer and van Meegeren used lead-based paints, which contain radioactive thorium-230. This decays into radium-226, which decays into lead-210, which decays into the stable lead-206. (There’s a boatload of other short-lived decay products, but their short lives mean their concentrations are very small at any given time.) When refined, the radium is mostly removed from the lead ore. Now hold that thought for a moment.

The rate at which the number of lead-210 atoms in the paint changes is determined by the rate at which the decaying radium-226 turns into lead-210, minus the rate at which the lead-210 itself changes into lead-206. Mathematically:

i-d4bb9fe09d6b78eb832985821d8a307f-1.png

The half-life of the radium-226 is about 1600 years and the half-life of the lead-10 is about 22.6 years. It’s possible to use these values and integrate the equations precisely, but in this case it’s not necessary. It suffices to know that since the paint starts of with almost no radium due to the refining process, almost all of the radioactivity of the sample will be characteristic of the lead-210. Since the first term of the equation above is initially pretty much zero due to the lack of radium, the radioactivity of the lead will decrease due to time as it radiates itself into inert lead-206. Meanwhile the radioactivity due to radium will increase as the thorium decaus into radium, increasing the radium’s concentration.

Lead and radium radioactivity can be distinguished easily, and by comparing the ratios in the alleged forgeries to the ratios in verifiable Vermeers it’s possible to distinguish them. For reasons of clarity the experiment actually measured the quantity (1 – (Ra/Po)), where Ra is the measured radiation from the radon and Po is the measured radiation from polonium, whose concentration closely tracks that of the lead-210. For the genuine paintings, the values of that quantity are in the .90-.99 range. For the fakes, the values are in the ~0.1 range. This conclusively demonstrates that Vermeer could not have painted the picture above.

This technique was not actually among the ones used during the trial, as it wasn’t available at the time. Van Meegeren’s innocence (well, lesser guilt) was argued on other evidence and his own demonstrated skill. Nonetheless, some questions remained until this technique was brought to bear on the subject. Good job, science!

[This story appears as a problem in a number of physics texts, but I actually first heard of it in an old Paul Harvey "Rest of the Story" book, of all places.]

Comments

  1. #1 Who Cares
    December 16, 2009

    Only 2 paintings were examined on the lead isotope composition because a Belgian art expert claimed they couldn’t be frauds.
    Six others that were claimed by Van Meegeren as his were later confirmed using gas chromatography.

  2. #2 phisrow
    December 16, 2009

    Van Meegeren must have had a low opinion of Göring’s art skills, or nerves of ice.

  3. #3 Uncle Al
    December 16, 2009

    Van Meegeren was penalized for screwing the Nazis! Were Dutch soldiers prosecuted for battlefield attempted homcide? Hire those jurists as consultants for US healthcare: the Public Option for Stalinized, er socialized, er Obamanation healthcare. Failure to buy “suitable coverage” causes a tax of 2.5% on gross income. If you don’t cough that up it is a felony: 5 years in prison and $250K fine.

    How could Obamacare possibly squeeze $250K out of somebody who cannot pay $1000 extortion/month? Easy! Organ harvest.

    Van Meegeren paints a pretty picture, past and future.

  4. #4 KyBoiler
    December 16, 2009

    Nicely explained, interesting post Matt.

    #3, That’s truly impressive moving from a physical analysis of radiometric decay to our so called marxist, stalinist, satanist, anti-christ, nazi President in two sentences. If you would fight through the big words and actually read some of the bill you would see that Mr. Beck has been lying to you.

  5. #5 CCPhysicist
    December 17, 2009

    In the second paragraph from the end you say “radon” when talking about Ra in the ratio. Radon is Rn so either the word or the ratio is wrong.

    However, it might make sense to detect the short-lived Rn-222 daughter of Ra-226 just as they presumably look at the Po daughter of Pb-210. (One of the few things I remember about nuclear chemistry is that the short-lived daughters appear and decay at a rate determined by the long-lived parent, so the differential equation does not change. What I don’t remember is which one is easier to detect.)

  6. #6 Uncle Al
    December 17, 2009

    Uncle Al quoted from his Congresscritter’s newsletter. We are currently enjoying a growing CT radiation overdosage scandal because diagnosis Officially cannot be held to safety standards. Those paintings must have lead and radiation warnings attached to Save Our Children, in utero and otherwise. They must be periodically monitored by diversity hires.

    If we prosecuted the guilty there would be insufficient resources remaining to harvest the innocent. If we respected facts we could not obtain needed verdicts. Government assumes its polity is criminal. A primary government goal is to verify that assumption by making it true.

    Van Meegeren cheated Nazis! The artist is a war criminal.

  7. #7 Comrade PhysioProf
    December 19, 2009

    Awesome post, motherfucker!

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.