Over at Effect Measure, one voice in the delectable collective that calls itself Revere (and every time I see that name, I think not of the patriot or of the eponymous town I drove through a week ago, but of the Beastie Boys) takes note of some nonbreaking news -- the "Blasphemy Challenge."
I'l expand on a comment I posted there, because I've been meaning to mention something similar for a while, and with all the talk about bargaining with the woos and nutters primarily in woonuttyspace appeasement and spin? Oh that's such BULLSHIT! framing it seems appropriate to bring it up now.
Forget the Blasphemy Challenge (and if you don't know what it is, do the research). I can understand why lapsy Christians, as part of breaking free of a lifetime of laboring under an overt or tacit bullshit threat, would bite. But to me it's no more meaningful than scampering up and down the nearby sidewalks screaming "STEP ON A CRACK, BREAK YOUR MOMMA'S BACK!" while stomping like crazy with both feet on every crevice and cranny in sight (and there are a lot of them) just to prove that I stone cold don't give a moldering shit about wooperstitious penalties. Although, come to think of it, I may have to try this just to see how the locals -- many of whom are consanguineous and skittish and impressionable -- react. If this doesn't work, I'll scamper back and forth under a ladder while smashing mirrors over the heads of black cats, yelling "BAD LUCK ME! BAD LUCK ME!"
Blaspheming is a victimless crime and a pointless exercise. Instead I want to see YouTube videos of people ambling around church parking lots during Sunday services and placing pro-rational "tracts" on people's windshields. I'm not talking about in-your-face "God doesn't exist, get used to it, ya f*ckin' hayseed!" stuff, but something genuinely useful and even seductive. Material that simply asks readers not to trust Pastor Blowmuff out of the gate; to consider that science is not in fact a natural adversary of a moral or spiritual or introspective life; to understand that evolution is not a tool created for the express purpose for battering Jesus into submission, but is simply one more aspect of how nature works, with or without my, your, or the Holy Ghost's approval.
These would employ easy-to-follow diagrams featuring smiling cartoon characters. They would employ lists of common myths about biology, geology, scientists, and human sexuality, and brief explanations of why these are wrong. They would invite readers to visit Web sites such as Talk.Origins (URLs would be more likely to inspire responses than book titles). Even lifelong and seemingly hopeless victims of the faith byrus might be helped out of the primordial darkness by such an offering.
I wouldn't bother with even mentioning the word "atheist" in these handouts, though. Not at first. All this would do is rile up the flock. You wouldn't try to get a Klansman to change his views about African-Americans by pointedly using the n-word -- something with which KKK members are intimately familiar and in one context only; to fundopaths, the a-word summons forth imagery just as loathsome.
Has this ever been tried? Obviously I'm not the first to conceive of such a plan. I would suggest this as a starting point. It's huge, lovely, and just far enough north so that riots may not ensue.





Comments
Parking lots? I don't know. Jonathan Safran has gone door to door in Salt Lake City, pushing the atheist message.
Posted by: Mustafa Mond, FCD | April 23, 2007 12:43 PM
Kevin, I'd be willing to collaborate with you or with some other writers and artists to create some appropriate pamphlets.
Anyone interested can contact me to discuss this futher here:
http://skepchick.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=16927#16927
(I don't have an email addy I'm comfortable posting publicly in blog comments.)
Donna
Posted by: writerdd | April 23, 2007 1:41 PM
Good idea, Donna.
Everyone else -- see the comment I posted on skepchick's blog. We could centralize the discussion there, and I'll continue posting about the PLC here until it actually comes to fruition.
Posted by: Kevin Beck | April 23, 2007 5:25 PM
I agree with you that the Blasphemy Challenge is pointless and immature. However, it does have at least one benefit: reading the comments from frightened Christians desperately trying to get those poor deluded infidels not to damn themselves to hell. I laughed out loud at some of the "No! Please! Stop! You don't know what you're doing!" comments.
So at least the BC provided a little entertainment. :)
Posted by: Wes | April 23, 2007 8:00 PM
What's in your belief?
Posted by: tsig | April 28, 2007 3:25 PM
Well, there's always the **NSFW** church whipper if tracts fail.
Posted by: anonymous lecher | April 28, 2007 9:22 PM
If there are any appropriate pamphlets on the net, I'd be glad to print out a few and slap 'em on some windsheilds. Of course, I could get shot doing it in Arkansas! Could you use an agnostic martyr?
Posted by: RobertM | April 29, 2007 12:13 AM
Try the stuff from any Metropolitan Community Church. It works on people too stupid to read the Bible for themselves, and gives a good laugh to everyone else.
Posted by: Dave | April 30, 2007 2:16 PM