Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dynamics of Cats

Speculations on astronomy, astrophysics, news I find interesting, theoretical issues, science and science policy. I will digress into computational physics, science fiction and general issues and basically whatever I feel like whenever. And, of course, cats.

Search

Profile

MyPicture0609c.jpg Still working on an analytic exact approximate solution to the herding problem.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

« Scientist Future Markets Spike on UK News | Main | It was 25 years ago today... »

Pluto: STFU already!

Category: astro
Posted on: August 14, 2006 1:54 PM, by Steinn Sigurðsson


So... is Pluto really a Planet?

IAU Press Release 01/99

February 3, 1999

Recent news reports have given much attention to what was believed to be an initiative by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) to change the status of Pluto as the ninth planet in the solar system. Unfortunately, some of these reports have been based on incomplete or misleading information regarding the subject of the discussion and the decision making procedures of the Union...


... 'course they can always change their minds, it is not like Congressional elections, you can do "do-overs" in science.

As I said before and in excessive detail here and here, using my amazing predicitive powers, though not, obviously, as amazing as the Mighty iPod

So, here is my definitive authoritative answer: Pluto is a Planet 'cause we said so.
So STFU - you expect The Astronomical Community to Admit Error? In this day and age.
No way. Consistency is overrated anyway.
Damm, makes me almost irate enough to fly to Prague and utilize my seriously underutilized IAU membership... but not quite.

Seriously, it is a label, it does not matter. It is not like naming conventions in astronomy are a leading example of purist consistency.
End the Madness Now.
Leave Pluto Alone.

It even has weather. Do "minor trans-Neptunian icy planetoids have weather? Stay tuned...

PS: having said this, I expect some IAU sub-committee will do something really stupid; if not on Pluto then on the equally explosive exoplanet definition issue...

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/18606

Comments

1

There are a lot of things in astronomy that we classified one way, only to find that the original classification isn't quite right. We usually leave it alone. For example, BL Lacertae objects are galaxies, but the name is a variable star name. Omega Centauri is a Bayer designation --- a star name. Pluto clearly doesn't fit with the other planets, but it made it on the list, so it stays there.

But, like you, I expect some IAU sub-committee to do something pretty silly on some topic.

Posted by: Astroprof | August 15, 2006 11:32 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.