Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dynamics of Cats

Speculations on astronomy, astrophysics, news I find interesting, theoretical issues, science and science policy. I will digress into computational physics, science fiction and general issues and basically whatever I feel like whenever. And, of course, cats.

Search

Profile

MyPicture0609c.jpg Still working on an analytic exact approximate solution to the herding problem.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

« Welcome Frosh | Main | one year ago today... »

Pope to embrace intelligent design?

Category: science
Posted on: August 27, 2006 10:19 PM, by Steinn Sigurðsson


Grauniad article reports...

Unfortunate Dr Coyne will not be available to lend his perspective on the meeting of the scholar's circle.


Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/19862

Comments

1

omfg...
This is bad news. It wouldn't make much of a difference for people in the US, where the catholic church is a minority, but it would elsewhere. I always have fun reading the debunkings of ID in SBlogs, while having the comfort of coming from a country where it is not an issue, and living in another where it isn't one either (and this applies even to their continents, Southamerica and Europe). But if the Pope jumps into the boat, I'll start hearing about it here and there. Specially there. I'd join the fight, sure, but it's a fun I'd rather not have.

Posted by: Irrelephant | August 28, 2006 2:04 AM

2

The partial embrace of enlightenment ideas by some religious sects was merely a delay of the inevitable-- like the compromises between Northern and Southern states prior to the Civil War.

A knock-down drag-out conflict between faith-based and reason-and-evidence-based worldviews is inevitable. This is shaping up to be the major cultural conflict of the 21st century. It will probably decide whether humanity will permanently accept it's industrial/technological experiment or will revert to a more primitive way of life.

Posted by: Adam Ierymenko | August 28, 2006 8:38 AM

3

Point of Logic on Natural Theory of Evolution:

The hypothesis of a Solar System evolution (i.e., formation by random events) is in dispute with Reality. Random events do not dominate the Universe. POINT OF LOGIC: In order for an event to be truly random, the event needs to be Sub-Natural (i.e., an event of Chaos - entropy product). Once the Sub-Natural event has entered the Natural Template, the event becomes confined and directed; the event loses the true randomness of Chaos. Therefore, there can be no Natural Theory of Evolution - only a Sub-Natural Theory of Evolution. Thus, the best lie is the subtlist lie.

The Natural Template of the Solar System is not a random event. PLEASE NOTE: The Pluto/Neptune anomaly of the Titius-Bode progression is predicted in the Initial Mass Displacements of the Solar System. The anomaly is not a random event.

Best Regards,

Frank Hatch

Posted by: Frank Hatch | January 5, 2010 11:19 PM

4

"subtlist lie" should read "subtlest lie" - Sorry, I'm sloppy.

The "subtlest lie" is dialectical logic: pretending to know the thesis and the antithesis to form a synthesis (Gensis 3: 4-6). All religions (including atheism) use it and rationalize it.
In Christianity, we've been commanded to wash each others feet from it. "Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees" (Matthew 16: 6,11). Don't worship your rationalization of God - worship God.

Best Regards,

Frank Hatch

Posted by: Frank Hatch | January 17, 2010 11:36 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.