Now on ScienceBlogs: "Investigative science journalism" and books I like to read [All of My Faults Are Stress Related]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Dynamics of Cats

Speculations on astronomy, astrophysics, news I find interesting, theoretical issues, science and science policy. I will digress into computational physics, science fiction and general issues and basically whatever I feel like whenever. And, of course, cats.

Search

Profile

MyPicture0609c.jpg Still working on an analytic exact approximate solution to the herding problem.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

« Corot discovery announcement | Main | Carnival of Space #34 »

theory vs practise

Category: science
Posted on: December 20, 2007 12:24 PM, by Steinn Sigurðsson

in theory there is no difference between theory and practice

a theorist can derive the Lie algebra for the non-commuting differential operators that describe the two axle parallel parking problem, and derive the constraint equations that determine the smallest space that can be parallel parked in

an experimentalist can parallel park

in practice there is a difference between theory and practice

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/59100

Comments

1

Something happen to your car, theorist??

;)

Posted by: Scott H. | December 20, 2007 2:03 PM

2

Oh my god, that is hilarious. Glorious, even. The little thrill I get when my mind jumps from one level of understanding to another gets me every time.

Lovely, lovely, absolutely wonderful. post of the year. haha.

Posted by: steph with a capital T | December 20, 2007 2:38 PM

3

that was the most amazing post ever

Posted by: Philip N. | December 20, 2007 3:30 PM

4

in practice there is a difference between theory and practice

On my blog I have a post titled, Abstract or concrete, which is more important? I think we need them both and they are both just as important. I love Albert Einstein for his theoretical work and also Thomas Edison for his practical work. Being able to sit here in the light, and discuss the theoretical is attributable to both of them! LOL!
Very nice post. Thanks very much!
Dave Briggs :~)

Posted by: Dave Briggs | December 20, 2007 5:29 PM

5

The way to express that thought is that in theory the experiment worked.

We have a great deal of practice to back it up

Posted by: Eli Rabett | December 26, 2007 10:53 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM