Now on ScienceBlogs: Rethinking cancer screening?

Seed Media Group

Dynamics of Cats

Speculations on astronomy, astrophysics, news I find interesting, theoretical issues, science and science policy. I will digress into computational physics, science fiction and general issues and basically whatever I feel like whenever. And, of course, cats.

Search

Profile

MyPicture0609c.jpg Still working on an analytic exact approximate solution to the herding problem.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

« under/over | Main | iPod iChing - HST late night edition »

I'll take anticorrelated isocurvature with tensor modes, please

Category: astro
Posted on: March 6, 2008 3:14 PM, by Steinn Sigurðsson

If you're a cosmologist, you need to rewrite your proposal. Now.

Well, 13,730 million if you have confidence in ground based data... looking through Apache Point apparently puts 40 million years on the universe.


Ok, WMAP-5 release is out, just in time for pedants on panels to quibble about everybody's cosmology related Hubble proposals using dated information.
Hence, clearly, they must be rejected in favour of observations of the local universe which are not sensitive to these parameters...

There is a stack of new, overlong, papers, which I suppose we must all eventually read and then pick one or two to actually cite.

Best of all, there is a handy-dandy summary table of the Officially Approved Parameters for Construction of Universe, release 5.0
as well as a dozen or so TLA'd models Which Will Not Do, At All.

We are at Concordance.
4.6% baryonic mass. 23.3% dark matter, mostly cold. 72.1% of No Clue.

and, we can all be grateful for the Official TLA Decryptor Table

No pretty pictures for my readers!
Get back to writing proposals, now, dammitt.

Sean's take
A pop-sci version

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/66041

Comments

1

I prefer my smudgy, hard to make out bits right up against bright nearby stars instead of in the middle of nowhere. Heck, if you look long enough at a star, you get the galaxies for free :)

Posted by: JohnD | March 6, 2008 3:41 PM

2

The Riofrio cosmology is not on the list. Neither is the no-DE Wiltshire cosmology. Why not?

Posted by: Kea | March 6, 2008 6:49 PM

3

Hmmmm. Your favourite choices (ISO1 and TENS) give the correct Omega(baryon) figures for the Riofrio cosmology. Are you perhaps secretly on the side of the crackpots?

Posted by: Kea | March 6, 2008 7:13 PM

4

I think the cosmologists are just too lazy to conduct a proper parametric study of theory models spaces...

I am however a confirmed adiabaticist, despite a good friend of mine having tried to convert me to the isocurvature heresy at a tender age


Posted by: Steinn Sigurdsson | March 6, 2008 10:19 PM

5

Happy Birthday Universe! Where do we celebrate? The Star Wars Bar? Yarrgh! Pass that flask of Klingon Ale this way! We'll all be seeing starstuff by midnight!!

Posted by: yogi-one | March 6, 2008 11:07 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM