Now on ScienceBlogs: Dr. Rolando Arafiles: Antivaccine rhetoric, colloidal silver for the flu, and Morgellons disease

Enter to Win

Dynamics of Cats

Speculations on astronomy, astrophysics, news I find interesting, theoretical issues, science and science policy. I will digress into computational physics, science fiction and general issues and basically whatever I feel like whenever. And, of course, cats.

Search

Profile

MyPicture0609c.jpg Still working on an analytic exact approximate solution to the herding problem.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

« Iceland to join EU by 2011? | Main | KITP: log(normal) »

KITP: xrb theory

Category: KITPastro
Posted on: January 30, 2009 1:59 PM, by Steinn Sigurðsson


in which we contemplate a compact accretor and a low mass donor, in theory


if you have a compact object, like a neutron star or black holes, then the potential energy at the surface is very negative, so any mass that falls onto the compact object may release a large amount of energy per unit mass

since this large amount of energy may be radiated (must in the case of a neutron star) and the object is compact, the characteristic temperature of the object is high - so they are typically x-ray bright

however, it turns out to be surprisingly difficult to get a low mass star to be "in contact" with a compact object through the course of normal stellar evolution, due to the deplorable tendency of the progenitors of compact objects to be massive, large and their propensity to hence eat any low mass star foolish enough to be nearby

however, in globular clusters such processes as exchanges and collisions and hardening of wide binaries can expedite the process of coming into contact, so we expect, and find, a high specific incidence of x-ray binaries in clusters



the devil, though, is in the details

including such minor issues as:
what is the duty cycle of different classes of XRBs, what fraction of the time is the system "on"
what drives the mass transfer and hence the lifetime and duty cycle? stellar evolution? gravitational radiation? magnetic braking? irradiatively driven mass transfer?
is there feedback onto the structure of the donor star?
why do XRBs in cluster tend to favour red clusters? except of course for M15?
what is the role of ultracompact binaries (degenerate low mass donor stars)?
when and where to orbital periods evolve out rather than in? what drives the period gap?



what are the resultant predicts x-ray luminosity functions?
predicted relative fraction of different donors?
distribution of final binary states, including possible "black widow" systems?

we gots to know.

so we think direct collisions between (sub)giants and neutron stars will make nice x-ray binaries, but, does "true tidal capture" - neutron star capturing an intact main sequence star in a close enough orbit for sustained mass transfer to take place late - does this ever take place.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/93737

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.