Now on ScienceBlogs: Alright, Neutrinos, The Jig Is Up!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Dynamics of Cats

Speculations on astronomy, astrophysics, news I find interesting, theoretical issues, science and science policy. I will digress into computational physics, science fiction and general issues and basically whatever I feel like whenever. And, of course, cats.

Search

Profile

MyPicture0609c.jpg Still working on an analytic exact approximate solution to the herding problem.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

« NASA: where is our stimulus, dude? | Main | Atlantis launch »

sunspots seen, NOT!

Category: astro
Posted on: May 11, 2009 2:53 AM, by Steinn Sigurðsson


we've been kinda low on sunspots for a while as we hit the inter-cycle low;
however, I heard rumours from Iceland that Aurora Borealis had been seen, so I scooted over to Soho to look see


UPDATE: nope, still no sunspots

Couple of nice spot complexes in the upper left.

Haven't checked the polarity to see if they are actually part of the new cycle, but it is likely they are.

Now we'll see if they're one off, or start of a trend...

Silly me, should have checked the other images,
I saw the emission line images and jumped on the magnetogram

Duh...

Here is the visible light image - no spots where the magnetic loops are
bummer.



click to embiggen


Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/109266

Comments

1

There are NO sunspots visible today - this is a magnetogram showing the solar field configuration; we only talk about sunspots when local cooling and thus dark spots visible in white light result. So the waiting continues

Posted by: Daniel Fischer | May 11, 2009 4:34 AM

2

You don't need sunspots to get aurora borealis, either. It helps to have solar activity, but the Earth's magnetosphere can produce spectacular aurora on its own. I know some people associated with the THEMIS mission and have read some of their papers--they have recorded some spectacular aurora in the two years the mission has been operating. The reason it's unusual to see visible aurora in May is because the long summer twilight tends to drown it out, but put a satellite with particle sensors in the right place and it will see the electrons that cause the aurora, no matter what time of year it is.

Posted by: Eric Lund | May 11, 2009 9:31 AM

3

yup, I heard about the spectacular aurora, and thought maybe there had been some solar activity - saw the emission line pics on Soho and grabbed the magnetogram, but somehow didn't look at the visible images
my mistake

Posted by: Steinn Sigurdsson | May 11, 2009 11:49 AM

4

In the magnetogram, are the dark areas shadows of the lighter areas (or vice-versa)? For the two large light/dark spots in the upper left, the neighboring dark/light spots look to have pretty much the same shape. You can also see similar pairs with the more noticeable small spots, particularly the two pairs in the upper middle section.

Posted by: dreikin | May 11, 2009 4:22 PM

5

you're seeing local magnetic field loops - so always paired

Posted by: Steinn Sigurdsson | May 11, 2009 4:26 PM

6

Try http://spaceweather.com/ - they consolidate a lot of the publicly available info from multiple platforms.

Posted by: Eric M | May 11, 2009 9:48 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.