Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

This is the Official Blogger SAT Challenge web site. Here, you'll find the essays posted by the entrants in the challenge, with tools to allow you to rate them and see the "expert" scores.

Our Blogs

The Origin of the Challenge

Analysis of the Results

Recent Comments

Acknowledgements

The Challenge is the work of Dave Munger and Chad Orzel, and grew out of discussions on ScienceBlogs.

Special thanks to Kate Nepveu and Jeremy Campbell for help setting up the site, and to our expert graders: David Bruggeman, Suzi, Elisa Davis, Natalie Hudson, Battlepanda and Lisa.

« 88287723.00 | Main | 287897726.00 »

87596964.00

Category: graded
Posted on: September 26, 2006 2:01 AM, by ScienceBlogs Admin

Struggle is clearly not a measure of accomplishment in any way. When struggling, you may or may not learn things or 'develop as a person'. If you do learn or develop, that is an accomplishment whether or not it was your originally intended accomplishment. If you don't change in any way while failing, nothing has been accomplished by definition.

[And here's the annoying bit: having shot down the prompt and run out of anything worth saying, I have to transition to asnwering the question which the prompt thinks it is asking--something about life as fulfillment in the journey, not the destination. Nuts to that.]



Show the score given by the expert grader

Rate another random entry

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

F: answer mentions nothing of success.

Posted by: Wilbur | October 3, 2006 6:27 PM

2

I rated low, but I think the writer makes a good point. These kinds of questions tend to be laughably front-loaded. They almost beg the student to go for a good grade by filling up the essay booklet with platitudes about the meaning of life and the human spirit and whatnot. This question could have been framed in a way that would lead the student toward a more philosophical/analytical answer, but unless you're dealing with a particularly naive and/or geeky 17-year-old, this question is going to generate a lot of Oprah-worthy emotionalist pabulum.

Posted by: Manolo Cabeza de Huevo | October 5, 2006 9:50 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.