Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

This is the Official Blogger SAT Challenge web site. Here, you'll find the essays posted by the entrants in the challenge, with tools to allow you to rate them and see the "expert" scores.

Our Blogs

The Origin of the Challenge

Analysis of the Results

Recent Comments

Acknowledgements

The Challenge is the work of Dave Munger and Chad Orzel, and grew out of discussions on ScienceBlogs.

Special thanks to Kate Nepveu and Jeremy Campbell for help setting up the site, and to our expert graders: David Bruggeman, Suzi, Elisa Davis, Natalie Hudson, Battlepanda and Lisa.

« 88287723.00 | Main | 287897726.00 »

87919591.00

Category: graded
Posted on: September 26, 2006 2:01 AM, by ScienceBlogs Admin

A great opportunity to face off against the welfare-society, everybody's-special, politically-correct Gramscian-derived drivel that encourages us to forget our roots, most especially in a Darwinian sense, and follow our fellow lemmings (false story, but the myth lives on) over the cliff.

It's all about struggles for scarce resources, whether economic, social, cultural or whatever. The bottom line, though, is all about what Rowbotham calls 'The importance of being noticed.' Each of us, he or she or in between, seeks the approval of our peers, however defined. For those of us at the fringes of society, we find alternative honor codes. Islamist fascists come to mind. Even so, all of us fall somewhere on the scale/continuum, each longing to feel important.



Show the score given by the expert grader

Rate another random entry

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

The first paragraph is a single clause that reads like braille on sandpaper. The rest is actually short enough that I can stand, despite the quality, to read it. Unfortunately, it doesn't answer the essay question or explain any "Darwinian sense".

Posted by: Carl Lumma | October 3, 2006 2:00 AM

2

Was this autogenerated by a random script? "Ignore-the-subject-matter-and-rant-about-random-crap-o'-bot-5000" would be a good name for it, in that likely case.

Posted by: Jason Thomas | October 5, 2006 6:10 PM

3

I hope the "6" rating by one of the readers was a joke...

Posted by: Dave Munger | October 6, 2006 7:17 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.