Now on ScienceBlogs: An Experiment in Teaching Writing: A Look Inside the Sausage Factory

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Chaotic Utopia

A tangenital mix of blogliness, studying the effects of time, change, and chaos

Profile

KLFportrait.jpg A student in Colorado, looking for some sort of synthesis--the big picture, encompassing all the strangeness in the universe--but willing to settle for the philosophic or poetic lens.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Tools for the Mind

Relax and Play

Friends

Colorado

Other Information

bloggerbioblitzlogo_mini_partic_froggy.jpg

asm.gif

Visit my original site here.

« The Battle of the Skeptic and the Empath | Main | Cycles and Circles (Fractal LXV) »

Even Witches Need Science...

Category: Riding the Waves
Posted on: October 31, 2007 1:27 PM, by Karmen

...or, what happens when pagans skip biology class:

witchbio.jpg

Happy Halloween!

Comic by Shivian Montar Balaris at Oh My Gods

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/54425

Comments

1

I'm not a biologist. What does weighing out some fungus have to do with plant biology?

Posted by: nescio | October 31, 2007 3:15 PM

2

A. muscaria, or "fly agaric" is a hallucinogenic mushroom closely related to the A. phalloides "death cap mushroom".

I would imagine that before ingesting any such substances, it would be wise to understand the biochemistry involved, including botany (identification), preparation, hepatotoxicity, etc.

Or just use your witchy-ways to guess.

Either way, it's not a smart thing to ingest, with or without urine (look that part up yourself).

Posted by: PalMD | October 31, 2007 4:14 PM

3

when I took biology in high school, I was taught that fungi are not plants. Has this changed? Since the cartoonist referred to "plant biology," wouldn't it have been better for the joke if the required ingredient was a plant (e.g., belladonna)?

I get the point, I'm just puzzled by the execution.

Posted by: nescio | October 31, 2007 4:36 PM

4

Nescio: Fungi are often taught in intro plant biology even though they are not plants. Why? Because apparently no other biologists want to teach it. Basic fungal lifestyles etc. are under botany 100

Posted by: Mel | November 1, 2007 12:19 PM

5

It's funny... here I expected to get a bunch of grief over the post on tarot cards, and here everyone is arguing over the comic strip.

Personally, I thought the phrasing just enhanced the kid's ignorance of biology. Plus, I believe most of our categories for what is what were created simply out of convenience... does the mushroom care if it is considered a plant or not?

Posted by: Karmen | November 4, 2007 12:59 AM

6

Just remember that just because my characters might not know plant vs fungal biology doesn't mean I don't.

Posted by: Shivian Balaris | November 12, 2007 3:29 PM

7

PS: thanks for the posting, it made me happy to see it posted about, then geeked over (even if it was to tear it to ribbons) ((grin))

Posted by: Shivian Balaris | November 15, 2007 12:49 AM

8

Shivian, I'm flattered that you commented; I love your comic. (I'm a fan of Nate, in particular, as you might have guessed.) Anyways, I'm always happy to share anything that might be critically geeked over--around here, that's the greatest form of compliment. Thanks for visiting!

Posted by: Karmen | November 15, 2007 4:15 PM

9

raivo pommer-www.google.ee
raimo1@hot.ee

Europe's largest bank, HSBC Holdings,


confirmed on Monday it was considering selling three of its major office buildings and said it
had received interest from potential buyers.

HSBC, which recently raised nearly $19 billion in a rights issue, said it may sell and lease-back office buildings in New York, Paris and London, including its headquarters at Canary Wharf.

London's Sunday Telegraph reported that HSBC was considering selling three of its biggest office buildings to raise 2.7 billion pounds ($3.98 billion).

"We are taking a look at the market, yes," spokesman David Hall said in Hong Kong.

"There are people interested in buying at an appropriate price," Hall said.

He declined to give further details.

HSBC bought back its building at Canary Wharf for 838 million pounds from ailing Spanish property firm Metrovacesa at the end of last year after the Spanish firm failed to refinance a loan secured on the building.

Globally, banks battered by the financial crisis have been looking to shed non-core assets in order to raise capital and improve their balance sheets.

"HSBC has just raised funds from a rights issue and the possible sale of offices could further boost its cash level and thus benefit the bank in its future acquisitions," said Alex Tang, head of research at Core Pacific-Yamaichi International.

The bank, which planned to shut most of its U.S. consumer lending business, said last month that it was ready for acquisitions in its traditional stronghold of Asia where many banks are pulling out to focus on core markets.

Posted by: Mel | April 14, 2009 8:22 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.