- Your comment must betoken that you have carefully read, and thoroughly understood both the post and whatever previous comments you might refer to. It must also have an internal logical coherence.
- Factoids, urban legends, factual errors or misrepresentations are not accepted
- Opposition to accepted scientific theories is scowled upon. Specifically, flat-earthers, still-earthers (deniers of plate tectonics), creationists, deniers of global warming and of overpopulation and those who think divine beings check out on how people have sex need not submit.
- The common rhetoric device which a learned colleague of mine has termed "pseudo-dementia" is a sure guarantee of rejection; for example, somebody who answers the line "Pharmaceutical companies cannot be relied upon to do a damned thing" with
Where exactly did you think that chemotherapy, [...] came from? I guess they must have just magically appeared in the pharmacopia while the pharmaceutical companies were sitting around not doing a "damned thing." stands no chance. Accepting this kind of post ends up in sterile picking on incoherence followed by a further deluge of it. - PP's and RR's are particularly unwelcome; PP's are Profit Prophets, those who base all their logic on "it makes money, therefore it shouldn't be opposed". RR's are Raving Republicans, people who cannot refrain from expressing their appreciation of every single side of the Bush administration, and are unable to do so in less than 500 words. No dialogue is possible between these two amply intersecting categories and civilised society, and I fancy this blog belongs to the latter.
Chemblog: the Addi(c)tive Blog
A place of pontificating about chemistry-related subjects ranging from relatively innocuous food frauds to such catastrophic events as global warming, passing through pollution, toxic food additives (a favourite), harmful medications, corporate subterfuge, government demagogy and all manner things frightening and depressing: if you don't want to subscribe to my feed, I somewhat understand.
Search this blog
Profile
Dr. X., former researcher, currently a corporate engineering drone, part-time professional writer, long-time sceptic.
Recent Posts
- A Cartoon History of Water Fluoridation
- The Words Not Spoken
- Of Drugs and Forests
- Today's "Ask a ScienceBlogger" Question
- Hello, World
Recent Comments
- s. zeilenga on The Words Not Spoken
- Snarfevs on Of Drugs and Forests
- Dr. X on Of Drugs and Forests
- Jonathan Ehrich on Of Drugs and Forests
- Dennis on Of Drugs and Forests
- Snarfevs on Today's "Ask a ScienceBlogger" Question
- world on Hello, World
Archives
Links Additives Links:- E-codes list (fundamental!)
- Household products database (US adminstration)
Medicine Links:
- Toxnet (US adminstration)
- Open Access Medical Journals (the most important are not in the list, but still)
Chemistry Links:
- Chemsketch (program to draw molecules)
- Sigma Aldrich (has MSDS for all their products)
Other Blogs
A Concerned Scientist
Other Information
My book is coming out. Actually, no, it has come out a couple of weeks ago; unfortunately, a link and thumbnail would reveal my identity to my company, whose activities include helping the Indonesian government in its most anti-environmental policies, so, no, sorry.
« Of Drugs and Forests | Main | A Cartoon History of Water Fluoridation »
The Words Not Spoken
Category: Meta
Posted on: June 20, 2006 4:00 PM, by Dr. X
A few guidelines for those who wish to see their comments published on this blog; silent readers need not bother with the following.
Send this entry to:
Email this entry to a friend
View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Comments
Uh... I was going to comment but #3 definately rules me out.
z.
Posted by: s. zeilenga | August 14, 2006 05:35 PM