Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Christina's LIS Rant

This is my blog on library and information science.

Profile

Christina Pikas Christina K. Pikas is a science and engineering librarian in a special library as well as a doctoral student in information studies.
Any opinions expressed here may not even be her own and certainly do not represent those of any organization willing to be affiliated with her.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Geography

Locations of visitors to this page

Where am I?

N 39 W 76

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Finalist

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0.

« Comps day 1 | Main | Comps day 3 »

Comps day 2

Category: comps
Posted on: July 16, 2009 5:00 PM, by Christina Pikas

So this was the dreaded STS. Crap. Good questions, but really, really not sure about my answers.  I did have the guts to shush people talking loudly outside the door and they gave me dirty looks. Oh well!

Q 1 choice between:

- relationship btwn science - technology - society. specifically, relationship btwn science and technology, science and society, technology and society... and how does all this influence sci-tech policy

or

- pick some major themes out of current sts research and describe them. say how you can use them in your research

picked the first

Q2 choice between

- what is a scientist? what do scientists have in common that distinguishes them from non-scientists?  is the boundary between scientists and non-scientists socially constructed?  how has that changed over time or how is it different over different cultures. what are the practical, political, and rhetorical advantages and disadvantages to drawing this boundary between scientists and non scientists?

or

- what aspects of STS are useful to librarians and information professionals?...

the second went on a little bit longer, but I picked the first.

I was so done at 4 hours - I wish I had run out of time so I could give that as an excuse. I think my answers weren't so hot.  I did a word count and the first was 1600 words and the second was 1300. I really felt that I repeated myself a lot.

sigh.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Education

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/115048

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.