Now on ScienceBlogs: Twitter: as in actual science jargon (something to do with marmosets and shrews)

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« JETLAG - new circadian gene in Drosophila | Main | Comissar in the Seventh House »

Obligatory Reading of the Day

Category: CognitionIdeologyPoliticsPsychologySociety
Posted on: June 26, 2006 4:20 PM, by Coturnix

Bush Is Not Incompetent by George Lakoff:

Progressives have fallen into a trap. Emboldened by President Bush's plummeting approval ratings, progressives increasingly point to Bush's "failures" and label him and his administration as incompetent. Self-satisfying as this criticism may be, it misses the bigger point. Bush's disasters -- Katrina, the Iraq War, the budget deficit -- are not so much a testament to his incompetence or a failure of execution. Rather, they are the natural, even inevitable result of his conservative governing philosophy. It is conservatism itself, carried out according to plan, that is at fault.

The article is long and elaborate, but the core idea is exactly what I wrote back in September 2005: Stop Beating on Bush!

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/8973

Comments

1

Oooh, that's the ticket, look beyond the superficial to the bigger picture. Our current situation is the result of a prolonged and concerted effort, employing empirical sciences such as demographic modeling and state-of-the-art computer modeling, in conjnction with some serious sociological and psychological applied advertising science, to manipulate the political climate. The people behind this 'movement' (neo-conservatism... look up Leo Strauss...) are certainly not retarded by a long shot. Our figurehead, Mr. Bush is the obvious red herring presented for our amusement, and to distract us, while the real plotters work for the most part in anonymity, safe from exposure and public scrutiny.

Posted by: :~)aniel | June 27, 2006 10:16 PM

2

Hey Daniel, I was just about to go visit your blog since I haven't been in a while. What's up?

Also, back to the topic of this post, this comment is also very true.

Posted by: coturnix | June 27, 2006 10:34 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM