Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

away%20from%20computer.jpg

I am the Online Community Manager at PLoS ONE. My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. This is a personal blog and opinions within in no way reflect the policies of PLoS ONE. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Join us at ScienceOnline'09

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

My Old Stuff

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« So I can invite my brother to stay with me for a couple of weeks now.... | Main | The Perils of Polls »

SEED scienceblogs getting more popular

Category: Blogging
Posted on: July 21, 2006 4:16 PM, by Coturnix

Technorati treats each of SEED blogs as anindividual entity but also the whole scienceblogs.com site as a single blog. Over the past week or so, the SB gradually moved up from #51 to #32 on the Top 100 Most Popular Blogs list. More you link to each one of us, or the site as a whole, higher up we'll get. Do you think we can overtake at least Michelle Malkin? At least we write empirically correct blogposts....

Comments

I don't care how well we do as long as we beat "Cute Overload" which is at present ranked 31st.

Posted by: Jake Young | July 21, 2006 4:30 PM

Oh, at least that!

Posted by: coturnix | July 21, 2006 4:31 PM

At least we write empirically correct blogposts....

And there are lots of other problems with it too. ;)

Posted by: Left_Wing_Fox | July 21, 2006 7:12 PM

Hey, I like Cute Overload!

As for "empirically correct" blogposts, uh, even I wouldn't claim that we SB'ers always do that. There have been a few times (one this just week) that I've been seriously tempted to administer a fisking to a fellow SB'er. No, I didn't restrain myself out of some misguided sense of fraternity, but simply because it wasn't interesting enough to motivate me to do it.

I did sort of do a fisking when I fisked a representation of Linus Pauling as unfairly vilified for his promotion of vitamin C as a cure for cancer and all sorts of other diseases, but it was Lee Billing on Stochastic (now Page 3.14), and so I'm not sure if that counts as "fisking a fellow SB'er" or not, given that he works for SEED. ;-)

Posted by: Orac | July 21, 2006 7:44 PM

I can take some ofthe credit for that. I no longer have individual science bloggers bookmarked on my machines. I have the Science Blogs front page marked and go to it a couple times a day to scroll through the recent posts. I'm also reading more science bloggers now.

Posted by: John McKay | July 21, 2006 9:30 PM

From what I understand the way the system works, it does not matter if you link to the SB homepage, the Last-24-Hours page or to any of the individual blogs or even posts - Technorati kicks in both for the individual blog and for the site as a whole. Just you wait until every single SB blog gets registered with Technorati - we'll challenge BoingBoing!

Posted by: coturnix | July 21, 2006 9:42 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs