A Blog Around The Clock : The mammoth, the knife flake and the possible alternative to Clovis

Search this blog

Profile

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS ONE. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com

Join us at ScienceOnline'09

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

My Old Stuff

Make Me Happy

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

I Support

Bloggie Stuff

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Wearing blue-blocking eyeglasses a few hours before bedtime resets the internal clocks to an earlier hour. | Main | Empire, Empiricism, Empowerment: Contributions to Political Cryptozoology »

The mammoth, the knife flake and the possible alternative to Clovis

Category: Paleontology
Posted on: August 10, 2006 4:40 PM, by Coturnix

The find of a knife flake together with a mammoth dated at 16,000 yo, spurs new speculations about pre-Clovis humans in the Americas. This is the clearest description I ever found of a possible alternative hypothesis to Bering-Clovis.

Comments

So much of the Pacific Rim has a fascinating (and unknown) history, from the Ainu to the Australian Aboriginies (sp?) to the Clovis to the Inuit to the Japanese to the Polynesians... So many interesting cultures with so many questions yet to be discovered. (At least, yet to be discovered by me... maybe more is known than I think...)

Posted by: pough | August 10, 2006 5:35 PM

Essentially this is a Berkeley Vs. University of Arizona thing. The argument for earliest humans being on the coast, and moving inland has a long history here in California archaeology. Many human remains on the California coast dated to older ages than 13,000BP. These were found in the era around WWII building boom in Southern California, and their age is open to question. The primary problem is one of negative evidence, most of the likely habitation sites are probably inundated since they predate the current ocean elevation after the continental ice caps melted. One of the major difficulties with Hayne's argument is that the dissemination of Clovis culture is younger in time as the sites approach the ice sheets, and head out towards the east coast, completely opposite if the hunters emerged from Beringia.

Mike

Posted by: mgr | August 10, 2006 7:19 PM