Now on ScienceBlogs: Telegraph: blame the rape victims - science says you can! [bioephemera]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Search

Profile

away%20from%20computer.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Keep the Light-Dark Cycles in the hospitals for the sake of patients and staff alike | Main | Clocks in Bacteria IV: Clocks in other bacteria »

Update on Blogs and Scientific Communication

Category: BloggingScience EducationScience PracticeScience Reporting
Posted on: September 8, 2006 8:51 AM, by Coturnix

You may remember this chart from three days ago. Now, Rob Loftis updated his chart after the inputs of a number of bloggers and commenters over the past few days, and John Dupuis has his own chart he uses in teaching about the flow of scientific information.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/20767

Comments

1

As someone with a tendency towards what is apparently Blasphemous among scientists (namely Generalism and/or interdisciplinarianism), where does "groups of scientists in different fields communicating amongst each other" fit in? Or does it at all?

(Should there be some kind of mediation group or groups to allow that to happen, or do Balkanized groups of scientific specialists just not want to talk to each other very often?)

Posted by: SMC | September 8, 2006 2:55 PM

2

Coturnix: Check the modified chart I have made on the above idea. I think it now has better clarity, but would love to hear your opinion...

Posted by: Arunn | September 14, 2006 5:11 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM