Now on ScienceBlogs: Wuv, Twue Wuv

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2009 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Research Blogging Awards 2010


Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Quail Ridge Books

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Basic Terms and Concepts | Main | I am practically famous! »

Reviewing the "Reviewer"

Category: Blogging
Posted on: January 22, 2007 11:50 AM, by Coturnix

You may have missed a mild slam of mine I snuck into the middle of this post yesterday (as well as an earlier one), at a guy who thinks he can dictate to a blogger how to blog and what to blog about. He is reviewing all Seed Sciencebloggers without, apparently, digging through anyone's archives to see their formidable output over the months and years of blogging, and without a thought that his notions of what a blog should be about are irrelevant to the blogger, the readers of the blog or the popularity of any particular blog.

Well, I would not review a book without reading the whole thing, or review a movie without watching the whole thing, so why does he think he can review a blog (or 55 blogs) without spending many hours reading through the archives of each, plus other blogs' posts that link to an "talk back" to the blog, etc. And while a book or a movie are static, 2-hour things that stand alone, blogs are dynamic and embedded in teh context of conversation. It is imperative to follow a blog for a few months on a daily basis before getting a really good feel for it. Everyone goes through phases, everyone slows down during busy times (e.g., grading) and everyone goofs off during holidays (the time this guy picked up for his reviews).

Carl, Orac and PZ (so far) and their commenters take him to task and explain a thing or two about blogging in general and science blogging in particular.

As one of the things that comes up in this discussion is his ignorance of blog carnivals, and I am sure he is watching his sitemeter in awe right now, here is a little educational link - Blog Carnivals and the links embedded in there.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/31165

Comments

1

I am only one data point but I am a person who reads science blogs, and I don't know who this self apointed content nazi is but I am not going looking for him or following any links.
I read for the data and for the brain-prodding and don't need a guide thank you very much.

Posted by: greensmile | January 22, 2007 10:04 PM

2

He's not a 'nazi' - he just has poor reading comprehension.
*sniff* hey, do you smell something ... like maybe a zombie?
;-)

Posted by: llewelly | January 22, 2007 10:54 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.