Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

me.jpg

I am the Online Community Manager at PLoS-ONE (Public Library of Science). My job is to try to motivate you to comment on the papers there. My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com

I Support the Public Library of Science

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

My Old Stuff

Read the archives of my old blogs:

Science And Politics

Circadiana

The Magic School Bus

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

Resources

Dictionary of Circadian Physiology

Basic Terms and Concepts in Math and Science

TalkOrigins

Find Science Blogs

I Support

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

« Introduction to Anatomy and Physiology | Main | This is a busy week in the world of Blog Carnivals... »

Are you a science blogger?

Category: BloggingScience Reporting
Posted on: February 1, 2007 1:11 PM, by Coturnix

If so, you should read this, print it out and stick it on the side of your computer monitor. Then re-read it every time you sit down to write a post discussing actual scientific research.

Comments

What if you want to write for a scientific audience ? Blogs are not only useful for science dissemination.

Posted by: Pedro Beltrao | February 1, 2007 1:39 PM

Sure, that is a different style altogether.

But most of us (at least at this point in the history of blogging) write mainly for the lay audience. Or for scientists in different fields who would not otherwise be able to understand the actual papers - we bring in the history and context to explain why the presented work matters.

Posted by: coturnix | February 1, 2007 1:44 PM

I posted a comment over at Cognitive Daily. Dave's description is way too long to post on the side of my monitor. If you want the short version, according to me, it's "get the science right" or,

ACCURACY, ACCURACY, ACCURACY

Posted by: Larry Moran | February 1, 2007 3:42 PM

Ha! Of course. Without it all else is superflous. But once you get Accuracy right, Dave's advice is golden.

Posted by: coturnix | February 1, 2007 3:45 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs