A Blog Around The Clock : The Two-Body Problem in Science

Search

Profile

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com

Join us at ScienceOnline'09

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

My Old Stuff

Make Me Happy

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

I Support

Bloggie Stuff

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Spartacus | Main | Cool Clocks »

The Two-Body Problem in Science

Category: Science Practice
Posted on: February 14, 2007 3:18 PM, by Coturnix

Jennifer Ouellette has an article in the new issue of Nature about the travails of married science couples.

Comments

Interesting enough, I suppose, but what does it have to do with science as opposed to business, highschool teaching, or a variety of other areas?

Posted by: Scott Belyea | February 14, 2007 4:06 PM

All of those are much more moveable than science. You can do business, teach school or be a nurse anywhere. You can be hired to do a very particular type of research likely at only one or two places on the planet - if you are lucky to get picked amond 200+ candidates who are equally good. Other departments in other school have no place for your specific type of research.

Posted by: coturnix | February 14, 2007 4:09 PM

You can do business, teach school or be a nurse anywhere.

Right. Everyone thinks that their problems are unique ...

Posted by: Scott Belyea | February 14, 2007 4:35 PM

There are shortages of nurses and teachers everywhere and one can start a business anywhere. An astronomer can only work at a telescope.

Every job opening attracts hundreds of highly qualified candidates who cannot find jobs elsewhere becasue only very few places on Earth are interested in (or have infrastructure needed for) any particular type of research. It is hugely more competitive than more other professions.

Posted by: coturnix | February 14, 2007 4:41 PM

I'm afraid it's not quite that simple. While it's true that there are professions that allow a great deal of freedom in location, there are some limits even on those. For example, if a nurse wants to work in a decent hospital, he or she is limited to communities with decent hospitals, which usually excludes smaller towns. For many professionals, you work where the job is. For example, I have to work about 120 miles from where I live. I could (maybe) find a job at home, but it would not be in my field and it would mean taking a 50+ pecent pay cut.

Posted by: Mark | February 14, 2007 5:07 PM