Earlier today (or was it late last night?), I made separate posts about new work on aquatic microbial diversity, on the copyright issues when reporting on science on blogs and on general relationship between science publishers and blogs. Now, via Dileffante, I have learned about a combo of all those questions: when you are dealing with an enlightened organization, such as PLoS, magic can happen. Jonathan Eisen, author of one of the microbial genomics papers has, with no fear of copyright infringement, copied the entire paper on his blog. It is a first, isn't it?
Search
Profile

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Join us at ScienceOnline'09
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Recent Posts
- ScienceOnline'09 - Nature blogging
- Science Cafe - Supernovae: The Violent Deaths of Stars
- My picks from ScienceDaily
- Clock Quotes
- Blog For Darwin
- The Structure of Scientific Blogolutions!
- Sanjay Gupta rumored to be picked for Surgeon General
- New and Exciting in PLoS ONE
- Today's carnivals
- ScienceOnline'09 - Friday Lab Tours
Recent Comments
- Angela on The Adult Film Industry: Time to Regulate?
- Coturnix on The Structure of Scientific Blogolutions!
- jc on The Structure of Scientific Blogolutions!
- Coturnix on Science Cafe - Supernovae: The Violent Deaths of Stars
- Bob O'H on The Structure of Scientific Blogolutions!
- Rhodri on Clock Quotes
- Ann on Protein Synthesis: Transcription and Translation
- Mike on Why teaching evolution is dangerous
- Coturnix on For the Clock Geek in all of us....
- Nathaniel Marshall on For the Clock Geek in all of us....
Archives
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
My Old Stuff
Make Me Happy
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Make Me Solvent
I Support
Bloggie Stuff

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
« Everything you always wanted to know about crayfish but were too afraid to ask.... | Main | Happy birthday Craig »
See the Future (of science publishing online)
Category: Blogging • Science Reporting
Posted on: March 14, 2007 5:14 PM, by Coturnix








Comments
I cannot find examples of other people doing this but it seems so straightforward no? I am thinking of putting my other Open Access papers on my blog too.
Posted by: Jonathan Eisen | March 14, 2007 10:03 PM
I know a bunch of us wrote posts about our papers and included figures from the paper, but I believe you are the first to actually reprint the entire paper. If I ever get myself back on track I intend to publish only in Open Source journals and will certainly reprint my papers on my blog in addition to a "plain-English" post explaining what it is that I really did in my paper geared towards a more lay audience.
Posted by: coturnix | March 14, 2007 10:08 PM
I can think of several instances when the author is an employee of the Yankee government and the paper, even when published in a for-profit journal, much less any of the professional society journals, is outside copyright. In that case, the entirety of the paper may be placed on a blog site, by the author or anyone. I know I have used the "loophole" a couple of times.
Posted by: Simple Country Physicist | March 15, 2007 10:59 AM