Eighteen year old Samantha Larson did it. Here is the story. Here is her blog.
(hat-tip: Ruchira Paul)

I am the Online Community Manager at PLoS-ONE (Public Library of Science). My job is to try to motivate you to comment on the papers there. My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
Read the archives of my old blogs:
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Dictionary of Circadian Physiology
Basic Terms and Concepts in Math and Science
« Today's carnivals, vol.2 | Main | ClockQuotes »
Category: Blogging
Posted on: May 23, 2007 11:37 PM, by Coturnix
Eighteen year old Samantha Larson did it. Here is the story. Here is her blog.
(hat-tip: Ruchira Paul)
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
Can't tell if you support this type of attention seeking or find it an example of self-indulgence.
Which is it?
Posted by: Ted | May 25, 2007 9:42 AM
Hmmmm...this is a blog. It is a tool of self-indulgence, almost by definition. Should I shut it down in order not to appear to seek attention?
Yes, I want attention because I want to build a community, make friends, make information available, connect people who do not know about each other yet should, and make things happen.
Posted by: coturnix | May 25, 2007 9:52 AM
I am assuming that you are not mistaking Samantha Larson's blog for 'attention seeking' and 'self-indulgence'. She just friggin' climbed Everest! People die there every year.
Posted by: coturnix | May 25, 2007 9:55 AM
I guess that I am mistaking it; it seems that this is the type of activity open to all properly motivated 18 year olds.
On reconsideration, this is surely a good way to measure individual accomplishment.
Hmmm...I don't think that I said anything about your self-indulgence, if you inferred that from my comment, you inferred wrongly. I was just wondering if you thought that as an ideal, is it a good idea that 18 year olds should be measured by this People die there every year yardstick.
Just seemed to me that privilege may have played a part, a father that's a doctor, Stanford, etc. But like you point out, I am mistaking it -- maybe it's just envy or something. I'll commit to re-evaluate honestly.
Posted by: Ted | May 25, 2007 10:19 AM