I am the Online Community Manager at PLoS-ONE (Public Library of Science). My job is to try to motivate you to comment on the papers there. My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
Read the archives of my old blogs:
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Dictionary of Circadian Physiology
Basic Terms and Concepts in Math and Science
« Clock Tutorial #4: On Methodology | Main | Now You Can (and Should) rate papers on PLoS ONE! »
Category: Pseudoscience • Psychology
Posted on: July 12, 2007 9:56 AM, by Coturnix
Echidne, Amanda Marcotte, Laelaps and Larry Moran beautifully destroy the "Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature" article from the recent issue of 'Psychology Today', the latest garbage from the Evolutionary Psychology crowd. Much fun was had by all....
TrackBack URL for this entry:
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
As regards to the blue-eyed blonde as the best looking woman, statistically this is horse pucky.
Take the billion females in the world who are neither too young nor too old, and of them take the best-looking thousandth fraction. Of the million best-looking females left, take the best-looking thousandth of them, leaving a thousand real lookers. Virtually all of them will be dark-haired, dark-eyed, and dark enough complected to qualify as having a complexion rather the absence of one.
Face it, brunettes rule the world of beauty.
Posted by: CRM-114 | July 12, 2007 11:04 AM
i agree about brunettes, but that's not what the article says. it's not that blondes are more attractive; rather, that youthful women are, and blond hair is a better indicator of youth
Blond hair is unique in that it changes dramatically with age. Typically, young girls with light blond hair become women with brown hair. Thus, men who prefer to mate with blond women are unconsciously attempting to mate with younger (and hence, on average, healthier and more fecund) women. It is no coincidence that blond hair evolved in Scandinavia and northern Europe, probably as an alternative means for women to advertise their youth, as their bodies were concealed under heavy clothing.
Posted by: skyotter | July 12, 2007 1:09 PM
I know this is a fun barstool chatter, but please read the linked articles - those are serious criticism of the entire endeavor.
Posted by: coturnix | July 12, 2007 1:11 PM
Thanks for passing this along!
Posted by: Kate | July 12, 2007 2:08 PM
Do you think that Trivers-Willard is garbage?
Posted by: Colugo | July 12, 2007 6:29 PM
I read all of the posts that you link to and none of them "destroy" the referenced article. Only one or two of the "facts" actually get challenged, the rest of the commentary only looks at the hypothetical explanations. Many of the objections claim that the article contradicts itself, but what they point to do not necessarily conflict.
None of the critiques offer any evidence that counters the claims made in the article. One reference to an MIT study, intended to counter the article actually ends up supporting it's claim. The examples offered alongside the MIT study (actually published on Alternet, hmm.) do not seem analogous phenomenon. The closest example, Kamikaze, actually support the reasoning presented in "Ten Politically..." as the social conditions reflect each other.
Further, each of the critiques do not take early human society or primate groups as their frame of reference. The original article may or may not have factual support; none of the linked to critiques present reasons to disregard the claims.
Posted by: ragabr | July 12, 2007 7:23 PM
I want Zuska's take on number 10 from the article.
Posted by: Jeb, FCD | July 12, 2007 8:26 PM
Rule of thumb: anytime you see something claiming to be "politically incorrect" you are about to see BS.
Posted by: QrazyQat | July 15, 2007 3:04 PM