Now on ScienceBlogs: Attack of the pregnant cannibal fathers

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« The State of Life Sciences | Main | Today's Carnivals »

I heard that badmouthing Microsoft is good for traffic...

Category: Blogging
Posted on: September 18, 2007 9:48 AM, by Coturnix

The program of the Microsoft/RENCI conference is now up. They would not let me give a talk, but I'll have to make a poster (using the darned MS Power Point, I guess #$%^&*) which makes me pretty mad. Heck, there is some unknown talking about science blogs instead of me. Who made this decision?

Compared to the organizers of every other meeting this year, from SciFoo, to ConvergeSouth, to ASIS&T, to the panel at Harvard (and yes, our own Science Blogging Conference), these guys are positively Palaeolitic in their attitude - from the haughtily-official looking site, to the very idea of submitting 'abstracts' (not to mention that this is done via a cumbersome submission form), it appears they barely scratched Web 1.0, yet they want to discuss Web 2.0.

Perhaps I should withdraw my poster and just go and schmooze with the likes of Timo Hannay and Jean Claude-Bradley instead, and try to actually teach some people there about Science 2.0 in the hallways.

Or perhaps I am just in a really bad mood today....and should be back to my usual sunny self by tomorrow.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/50936

Comments

1

Speaking of posters and talking in the hall and such, would you like to present at our Science Blogging SciFoo Lives On session on October 1, 2007 at noon ET?

We'll be asking the other science bloggers at SciFoo as well but you're the first on the list:)

The event is on Second Life and is open to everyone.

For info about past sessions see the SFLO wiki
http://scifooliveson.wikispaces.com

Posted by: Jean-Claude Bradley | September 19, 2007 9:33 AM

2

"using the darned MS Power Point, I guess #$%^&*"

NO! Use Adobe InDesign.

Posted by: PhysioProf | September 21, 2007 6:46 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM