Now on ScienceBlogs: Must Read

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2009 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Research Blogging Awards 2010


Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Quail Ridge Books

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« The State of Life Sciences | Main | Today's Carnivals »

I heard that badmouthing Microsoft is good for traffic...

Category: Blogging
Posted on: September 18, 2007 9:48 AM, by Coturnix

The program of the Microsoft/RENCI conference is now up. They would not let me give a talk, but I'll have to make a poster (using the darned MS Power Point, I guess #$%^&*) which makes me pretty mad. Heck, there is some unknown talking about science blogs instead of me. Who made this decision?

Compared to the organizers of every other meeting this year, from SciFoo, to ConvergeSouth, to ASIS&T, to the panel at Harvard (and yes, our own Science Blogging Conference), these guys are positively Palaeolitic in their attitude - from the haughtily-official looking site, to the very idea of submitting 'abstracts' (not to mention that this is done via a cumbersome submission form), it appears they barely scratched Web 1.0, yet they want to discuss Web 2.0.

Perhaps I should withdraw my poster and just go and schmooze with the likes of Timo Hannay and Jean Claude-Bradley instead, and try to actually teach some people there about Science 2.0 in the hallways.

Or perhaps I am just in a really bad mood today....and should be back to my usual sunny self by tomorrow.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/50936

Comments

1

Speaking of posters and talking in the hall and such, would you like to present at our Science Blogging SciFoo Lives On session on October 1, 2007 at noon ET?

We'll be asking the other science bloggers at SciFoo as well but you're the first on the list:)

The event is on Second Life and is open to everyone.

For info about past sessions see the SFLO wiki
http://scifooliveson.wikispaces.com

Posted by: Jean-Claude Bradley | September 19, 2007 9:33 AM

2

"using the darned MS Power Point, I guess #$%^&*"

NO! Use Adobe InDesign.

Posted by: PhysioProf | September 21, 2007 6:46 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.