Mythbusting Canadian Health Care -- Part I by Sara Robinson.
Constitutional Originalism, Natural Law, and The Ninth Amendment by PhysioProf.

I am the Online Community Manager at PLoS-ONE (Public Library of Science). My job is to try to motivate you to comment on the papers there. My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
Read the archives of my old blogs:
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Dictionary of Circadian Physiology
Basic Terms and Concepts in Math and Science
« So, shall we see you again next year? | Main | The Island Project »
Category: Politics
Posted on: February 10, 2008 9:19 PM, by Coturnix
Mythbusting Canadian Health Care -- Part I by Sara Robinson.
Constitutional Originalism, Natural Law, and The Ninth Amendment by PhysioProf.
Find more posts in:
Politics
Medicine & Health
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
PhysioProf was doing nothing more than name calling. It is laughable that anyone could write that conservatives want to strip away freedom and liberty from people and give it to the government. That conveniently ignores that liberals want to do precisely that when it comes to the freedom to bear arms and it also ignores that liberals want to strip away the gith to private property as is evidenced by the Kelo decision.
Posted by: Mike | February 11, 2008 11:00 AM
BS. Liberals are if anything more vocal than conservatives against Kelo decisions. And they (except for some Bambi extremists who have no voice in the Democratic party) not against the right to bear arms - total GOP talking points intended to scare the folks into voting against their interests.
It is the GOP who is spying on citizens and peering into bedrooms and wasting all the money on the military actions - which is government.
Posted by: Coturnix | February 11, 2008 11:05 AM
If liberals are so opposed to the Kelo decision, why did every single Democratically appointed justice vote for the Kelo decision? And why have the Democratic candidates promised to nominate juistices who are just like the justices who decided Kelo?
If it is only a talking point, why has Obama voted to ban handguns and voted to punish people who prevent assaults and home invasions if the people use a handgun?
Posted by: Mike | February 12, 2008 8:27 AM
Because those so-called Democrats are not liberals? I know in your world everyone to the left of Ghengis Khan is the scary "liberal", but there is a lot of difference and liberal blogs are primarily worried about non-liberalness of some Democrats in power. You need to get the nuance: who is who, i.e., the difference between the Dem party which is right of center and the ordinary Americans (except for the 20% of so of reactionaries, neo-Nazis and other mouthbreathers who align themselves with the extreme-Right GOP) are actually Left of center.
Posted by: Coturnix | February 12, 2008 8:39 AM