Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2009 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Research Blogging Awards 2010


Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Quail Ridge Books

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« SAGE keeps opening up.... | Main | See you at the SRBR meeting! »

Link Journalism

Category: BloggingMedia
Posted on: March 2, 2008 5:54 PM, by Coturnix

The proposal for link journalism is not a new concept, though the phrase is good. This is something that bloggers have been doing for years and have been imploring the corporate media to adopt for years. On paper, you can provide references in the footnotes or endnotes, or you can mention "unnamed sources", but in the age of the Web, it is sheer blindness not to use links - nobody will trust you if they cannot click and instantly verify your statements. Remember - no links, no reputation.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/65652

Comments

1

Do you think links ought be included after a video newscast? It's more work.

Posted by: David Lee | March 2, 2008 7:37 PM

2

Good question. I think the answer is Yes. It will become less work as people design easier ways to do it, and they will design it if there is a demand/need for it.

Posted by: Coturnix | March 2, 2008 7:42 PM

3

We are considering the idea of adding links both in the video and on the page but haven't done it much. It might make the each short video story less authoritative if people can see all the data that gets boiled down. You'd have less control of the message in a way. Not to mentioning linking to sites you might not want to promote.

Posted by: David Lee | March 2, 2008 7:52 PM

4

New Scientist now always asks me for relevant links when I submit a story, so I think things are definitely trending that way. I hope so. I can't imagine NOT making use of hyperlink technology in journalism, especially now that everything's moving online. We don't want to be spoon-fed our news anymore! :)

Posted by: Jennifer Ouellette | March 2, 2008 10:27 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.