Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

me.jpg

I am the Online Community Manager at PLoS-ONE (Public Library of Science). My job is to try to motivate you to comment on the papers there. My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com

I Support the Public Library of Science

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

My Old Stuff

Read the archives of my old blogs:

Science And Politics

Circadiana

The Magic School Bus

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

Resources

Dictionary of Circadian Physiology

Basic Terms and Concepts in Math and Science

TalkOrigins

Find Science Blogs

I Support

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Science Blogging Conference 08

Science Blogging Conference 07

Bloggie Stuff

« My picks from ScienceDaily | Main | A nice brief tutorial on sleep »

Science in the news: to push for it or to hide it?

Category: MediaScience Reporting
Posted on: March 19, 2008 11:56 PM, by Coturnix

Should we have a third culture?:

The present problems with science communication are not only a result of mediocre writing skills or the diminished view of popularization the some scientists take. The public, aptly described as "consumers," have not developed much of a taste for science. As important as science has become, for many people it concerns itself with questions that won't pay their bills or put food on the table, and therefore requires little attention. If it's not interesting, why take an interest in it? Such a view is absolutely dismal, but many people have a somewhat narrowed view of science that is primarily good for creating medical and technological advances; the rest can safely be ignored.

Why Doesn't Cable News Cover Science?:

Why is science so poorly covered by cable television? I'm tempted to cite the complexity of scientific topics and the superficiality of cable news, but I'm not sure that's correct: After all, it's perfectly possible to be successful with bad science news, and TV news isn't necessarily stupid.

Should Cable News Networks Cover Science?:

Does the fare offered by the Discovery Channel and National Geographic make up for the absence of science on CNN, MSNBC and Fox News? How is it different than what those networks might offer -- and as cable news networks are synonymous with sound bites and spin, might it be better for science to stay under their radar?

How Science Defenders Enable Anti-Science Forces:

There's certainly a longstanding mentality among progressive groups that nonsense must be refuted, often in rapid-fire mode if possible. But that mindset runs up against something else that ought to be obvious: controversy sells. If you create a big fuss over what your intellectual opponent is saying, you might well be helping him or her.

I guess I'm just playing right into his hands:

Given this reality of the way stories are written, I would imagine that reporters will continue to call scientists for quotes when creationist movies come out or global warming denialists get together for a convention. What are they supposed to say? "I'm not going to say anything; that's emboldening the creationists,"?

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com